Unjust Enrichment and Corrective Justice

Understanding Unjust Enrichment

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 111-137

  Klimchuk, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138979125     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. K Barker, ‘Unjust Enrichment: Containing the Beast’ (1995) 15 OJLS 457
2. E Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1995) 140-42
3. M McInnes, ‘The Measure of Restitution’ (2002) 52 UTLJ 163.
4. RB Grantham and CEF Rickett, Enrichment and Restitution in New Zealand (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000) 144
5. G Virgo in ‘What is the Law of Restitution About?’ in W R Cornish et al (eds), Restitution: Past, Present and Future (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998) 312-18
6. P Birks, ‘Property and Unjust Enrichment: Categorical Truths’ [1997] New Zealand Law Review 623.
7. P Jaffey, The Nature and Scope of Restitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000) ch 9.
8. S Smith, ‘Justifying the Law of Unjust Enrichment’ (2001) 79 Texas Law Review 2177
9. P Birks, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1985) 23-25.
10. L Smith, ‘Unjust Enrichment, Property, and the Structure of Trusts’ (2000) 116 LQR 412.
11. L Smith in ‘The Province of the Law of Restitution’ (1992) 71 Canadian Bar Review 672.
12. R McKeon (ed), The Basic Works of Aristotle(New York, Random House, 1941).
13. E Weinrib, ‘The Gains and Losses of Corrective Justice’ (1994) 44 Duke Law Review 277
14. M Stone, ‘The Significance of Doing and Suffering’ in G Postema (ed), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001) 131-82
15. H Dagan, ‘Mistakes’ (2001) 79 Texas Law Review 1795, 1798-99.
16. T Pogge, ‘Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a “Comprehensive Liberalism”?’
17. B Ludwig, ‘Whence Public Right? The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reason in Kant’s Doctrine of Right’ in M Timmons (ed), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002), 133-58
18. J Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration (Buffalo, Prometheus Books, 1990) 20.
19. I Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals, translation M Gregor (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996) 24.
20. L Ho, ‘The Nature of Restitution—A Reply’ (1999) 16 OJLS 517.
21. S Perry ‘The Moral Foundations of Tort Law’ (1992) 77 Iowa Law Review 449, 461.
22. J Gordley, ‘Restitution Without Enrichment? Change of Position and Wegfall der Bereicherung’ in D Johnston and R Zimmermann (eds) Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002) 227
23. P Birks, ‘The Concept of a Civil Wrong’ in D Owen (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995) 31, 48-9
24. L Smith, ‘Property, Subsidiarity, and Unjust Enrichment’ in D Johnson and R Zimmermann (eds), Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002) 588, 610-23.