Responsibility for Gain: Unjust Factors or Absence of Legal Ground? Starting Points in Unjust Enrichment Law

Structure and Justification in Private Law: Essays for Peter Birks

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 47-74

  Barker, Kit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138935513     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. P Birks, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1985, revised edn 1989).
2. I Englard, ‘Restitution of Benefits Conferred Without Obligation’ in International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol X (1991), ch 5.
3. S Meier, Irrtum und Zweckverfehlung (Tübigen, Mohr Siebeck, 1999).
4. S Meier and R Zimmerman, ‘Judicial Development of the Law, Error Iuris and the Law of Unjustified Enrichment’ (1999) 115 LQR 556
5. S Meier, ‘Unjust Factors and Legal Grounds’ in D Johnston and R Zimmerman (eds), Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002) ch 2;
6. S Meier, ‘No Basis: A Comparative View’ in A Burrows and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry (eds), Mapping the Law: Essays in Memory of Peter Birks (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006) 343.
7. P Birks, Unjust Enrichment (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2nd edn, 2005).
8. R Zimmerman, ‘Unjustified Enrichment: the Modern Civilian Approach’ (1995) 15 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 403.
9. P Watts, ‘Unjust Enrichment’ (2005) 121 LQR 163, 166 (reviewing P Birks, n 5 above).
10. M McInnes, ‘Making Sense of Juristic Reasons: Unjust Enrichment after Garland v Consumers’ Gas’ (2004) 42 Alberta Law Review 399.
11. K Barker, ‘Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and its Reasons’ in J Neyers, M McInnes, S Pitel (eds), Understanding Unjust Enrichment (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004)
12. J Dawson, Unjust Enrichment: A Comparative Analysis (Boston, MA, Little Brown, 1951) 5–6.
13. L Smith, ‘Three-party Restitution: A Critique of Birks’ Theory of Interceptive Subtraction’ (1991) 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 481, 483.
14. C Wonnell, ‘Replacing the Unitary Principle of Unjust Enrichment’ (1996) 45 Emory Law Journal 153
15. H Dagan, The Law and Ethics of Restitution (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2004) 18
16. J Gordley, Foundations of Private Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006) 423–5.
17. K Barker, ‘Theorising Unjust Enrichment Law: Being Realist(ic)?’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 609, 612–17.
18. T Honoré, Responsibility and Fault (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1999) chs 2, 4.
19. P Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002).
20. P Cane, ‘Responsibility and Fault: A Relational and Functional Approach to Responsibility’ in P Cane and J Gardner (eds), Relating to Responsibility (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001), 96.
21. P Saprai, ‘Restitution Without Corrective Justice’ [2006] Restitution Law Review 41.
22. E Weinrib, ‘The Gains and Losses of Corrective Justice’ (1994) 44 Duke Law Journal 277.
23. J Raz, ‘Promises in Morality and Law’ (1982) 95 Harvard Law Review 916, 929.
24. L Smith, ‘The Mystery of Juristic Reason’ (2000) 12 Sup Ct Law Review (2d) 211, 228.
25. G Virgo, The Principles of the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2006) ch 23.
26. J Fleming, ‘Tort in a Contractual Matrix’ (1995) 3 Tort Law Review 12;
27. M McInnes, ‘Unjust Enrichment, Juristic Reasons and Palm Tree Justice: Garland v Consumers’ Gas Co’ (2004) 40 Can Bus Law Journal 103;
28. M McInnes, ‘Juristic Reasons and Unjust Factors in the Supreme Court of Canada’ (2004) 120 LQR 554.
29. R Grantham, ‘Absence of Juristic Reason in the Supreme Court of Canada’ [2005] Restitution Law Review 102.
30. G Klippert, ‘The Juridical Nature of Unjust Enrichment’ (1980) University of Toronto Law Journal 356.
31. B Nicholas, ‘Unjustified Enrichment in Civil Law and Louisiana Law’ (1962) 36 Tulane Law Review 605.
32. T Krebs, Restitution at the Crossroads: A Comparative Study (London, Cavendish Press, 2001).