SUPPORTING SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEMS: BOUNDARY OBJECTS, COMMUNITIES, AND BROKERING

Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 329-338

  Pawlowski, Suzanne D ^a   Raven, Dan Robey Arjan ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA WAREHOUSES; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INFORMATION USE;

BOUNDARY OBJECTS; COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE; COMPREHENSIVE MODELING; ERP SYSTEM; INTEGRATED INFORMATIONS; INTERPRETIVE CASE STUDIES; LARGE COMPANIES; MODELLING STUDIES; SHARED INFORMATION; SYSTEM BOUNDARY;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85138673326     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Avison, D., Wood-Harper, A., Vigden, R., and Wood, J. “A Further Exploration Into Information Systems Development: The Evolution of Multiview2,” Information Technology & People (11), 1998, pp. 124-139.
2. Boehm, B., Egyed, A., Kwan, J., Port, D., Shah, A., and Madachy, R. “Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study,” Computer (31:7), 1998, pp. 33-44.
3. Boland, R., Tenkasi, R., and Te'eni, D. “Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition,” Organization Science (5:3), 1994, pp. 456-475.
4. Briand, L., Morasca, S., and Basili, V. “Designing and Validating Measures for Object-based High Level Design,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (25:5), 1999, pp. 722-743.
5. Brown, C. “Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site," Information Systems Research (8:1), March 1997, pp. 69-94.
6. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,” Organization Science (2:1), 1991, pp. 102-111.
7. Carmel, E., Whitaker, R., and George, J. “PD and Joint Application Design: A Transatlantic Comparison,” Communications of the ACM (36:4), 1993, pp. 40-48.
8. Darke, P., and Shanks, G. “User Viewpoint Modelling: Understanding and Representing User Viewpoints During Requirements Definition,” Information Systems Journal (7), 1997, pp. 213-239.
9. Davenport, T. Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
10. Denzin, N. “The Art and Politics of Interpretation,” in Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998, pp. 313-344.
11. Easterbrook, S., and Nuseibeh, B. “Using Viewpoints for Inconsistency Management,” Software Engineering Journal (11), 1996, pp. 31-43.
12. Edwards, C. “Information Systems Maintenance: An Integrated Perspective,” MIS Quarterly (8:4), 1984, pp. 237-256.
13. Eriksen, L., Axline, S., and Markus, M. “What Happens After ‘Going Live’ with ERP Systems? Competence Centers Can Support Effective Institutionalization,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, August 13-15, 1999, pp. 776-778.
14. Gable, G., Scott, J., and Davenport, T. “Cooperative ERP Life-cycle Knowledge Management,” in Proceedings of the Ninth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, B. Edmundson and D. Wilson (eds.), Sydney, September 29-October 2, 1998.
15. Glass, R., and Vessey, I. “Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Can They Handle the Enhancement Changes Most Enterprises Require?,” Keynote Address presented to the First International Workshop on Enterprise Management and Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Methods, Tools and Architectures (EMRPS’99), Venice, Italy, 1999.
16. Kim, C., and Weston, S. “Software Maintainability: Perceptions of EDP Professionals,” MIS Quarterly (12:2), 1988, pp. 167-185.
17. Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), March 1999, pp. 67-93.
18. Lassila, K., and Brancheau, J. “Adoption and Utilization of Commercial Software Packages: Exploring Utilization Equilibria, Transitions, Triggers, and Tracks,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:2), 1999, pp. 63-90.
19. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
20. Leonard-Barton, D. “Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization,” Research Policy (17), 1988, pp. 251-267.
21. Markus, M. L. “Conceptual Challenges in Contemporary IS Research,” Communications of the AIS (3:4), 2000 (http://cais.isworld.org/contents.asp).
22. Martin, R., and Osborne, W. Guidance on Software Maintenance, NBS Special Publication, 500-106, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1983.
23. Orlikowski, W., Yates, J., Okamura, K., and Fujimoto, M. “Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use,” Organization Science (6), 1995, pp. 423-444.
24. Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. “Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 261-290.
25. Schwandt, T. “Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry,” in The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998, pp. 221-259.
26. Star, S. L., Bowker, G., and Neumann, L. “Transparency at Different Levels of Scale: Convergence Between Information Artifacts and Social Worlds,” 1997 (http://weber.ucsd.edu/~gbowker/converge.html; accessed 1 September 2000).
27. Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. R. “Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1930,” Social Studies of Science (19), 1989, pp. 387-420.
28. Strauss, A. “A Social World Perspective,” Studies in Symbolic Interaction (1), 1978, pp. 119-128.
29. Swanson, E. B. “IS ‘Maintainability’: Should It Reduce the Maintenance Effort?,” Database (30:1), 1999, pp. 65-76.
30. Swanson, E. B., and Dans, E. “System Life Expectancy and the Maintenance Effort: Exploring Their Equilibration,” MIS Quarterly (24:2), 2000, pp. 277-297.
31. Tapscott, D., and Caston, A. Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of Information Technology, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.
32. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998.