Linguistic representations of motion events What is signifier and what is signified?

Iconicity in Language and Literature

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 307-322

  Slobin, Dan I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138570118     PISSN: 18735037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/ill.4.22slo     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
3. Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Advances in the Investigation of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Kersten, A. W., Meissner, C. A., Schwartz, B. L., & Rivera, M. (2003). (April). Differential sensitivity to manner of motion in adult English and Spanish speakers. Paper presented to Biennial Conference of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, Florida.
6. Malblanc, A. (1994). Pour une stylistique comparée du français et de l’allemand: Essai de représentation linguistique comparée. Paris: Henri Didier.
7. Matsumoto, Y. (1966). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–226.
8. Oh, K.-J. (2003). Language, cognition, and development: Motion events in English and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
9. Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2000). Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Slobin, D. I. (1996a). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz & Levinson (Eds.), 70–96.
11. Slobin, D. I. (1996b). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Slobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Niemeier & Dirven (Eds.), 107–138.
14. Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Thought, D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Investigation of Language and Thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist & Verhoeven (Eds.), 219–257.
16. Slobin, D. I. (In press a). Relating events in translation. In D. Ravid & H. B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on Language and Language Development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Slobin, D. I. (In press b). Relations between paths of motion and paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–505.
19. Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). (2004). Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Lexical Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.
22. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1958). Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Montreal: Beauchemin.