Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature

Iconicity in Language and Literature

Volumn 2, Issue , 2001, Pages 17-28

  Nöth, Winfried ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138528432     PISSN: 18735037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/ill.2.05not     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Abrams, M. H. 1953. The Mirror and the Lamp. London: Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, E. R. 1999. A Grammar of Iconism. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Press.
3. Bouissac, P., M. Herzfeld and R. Posner (eds). 1986. Iconicity: Essays on the Nature of Culture. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
4. Haiman, J. (ed.). 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Hinton, L., J. Nichols and J. J. Ohalla (eds). 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.
6. Jakobson, R. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics”. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), 350–377.
7. Jakobson, R. (1965) 1971. “Quest for the Essence of Language”. In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings II, 345–359. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Jakobson, R. 1977. “A Few Remarks on Peirce, Pathfinder in the Science of Language”. In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings VII, 248–253. The Hague: Mouton.
9. Johansen, J. D. 1996. “Iconicity in Literature”. Semiotica 110: 37–55.
10. Landsberg, M. E. (ed.). 1995. Syntactic Iconicity and Language Freezes: The Human Dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Lotman, J. M. (1970) 1972. Die Struktur literarischer Texte. München: Fink.
12. Nänny, M. and O. Fischer (eds). 1999. Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Nöth, W. 1990a. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
14. Nöth, W. 1990b. “The Semiotic Potential for Iconicity in Spoken and Written Language”. Kodikas/Code 13: 191–209.
15. Nöth, W. 1993. “Iconicity of Symmetries and Asymmetries in Syntactic Coordination”. In Von der Sprache zur Literatur: Motivierheit im sprachlichen und im poetischen Kode, C. Küper (ed.), 23–36. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
16. Nöth, W. 1994. “Symmetry in Oral and Written Language”. In Writing vs. Speaking, S. Cmejrková, F. Danes and E. Havlová (eds), 97–110. Tübingen: Narr.
17. Nöth, W. 2000. Handbuch der Semiotik, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Metzler.
18. Pape, H. 1996. “Object and Final Cause in Peirce’s Semeiotic”. In Peirce’s Doctrin of Signs, V. M. Colapietro and T. M. Olshewsky (eds), 103–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. Collected Papers. Vols. 1–6, eds C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, vols. 7–8, ed. A. W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press. (Quoted as CP. Reference is made to vols. and paragraphs.)
20. Ransdell, J. 1979. “The Epistemic Function of Iconicity in Perception”. Peirce Studies 1: 51–66.
21. Santaella, L. 1995. A teoria geral dos signos. São Paulo: Ática.
22. Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1916) 1959. Course in General Linguistics, eds C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, transl. W. Baskin, New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Simone, R. (ed.). 1995. Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Waugh, L. 1992. “Let’s Take the Con out of Iconicity: Constraints on Iconicity in the Lexicon”. The American Journal of Semiotics 9: 7–48.