Dividing the Family Assets

Undercurrents of Divorce

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 209-230

  Diduck, Alison ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136413223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429242755-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Axon, L and Hann, R. (1994), Working Document: Court Dispute Resolution Processes: The Application of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Courts, Research, Statistics and Evaluation Directorate, Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa.
2. Backett, K. (1982), Mothers and Fathers, Macmillan, London.
3. Bainham, A. (1998), ‘Changing Families and Changing Concepts - Reforming the Language of Family Law’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol 10(1), p.l.
4. Barry, N. (1995), ‘Justice and Liberty in Marriage and Divorce’, in R.Whelan (ed.), Just a Piece of Paper?, Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit, London.
5. Brannen, J., Meszaros, G., Moss, P, and Poland, G, (1994), Employment and Family Life: A Review of Research in the UK (1980-1994), Department of Employment Research Series No. 41, University of London, London.
6. Cotterrell, R. (1988), ‘Feasible Regulation for Democracy and Social Justice’, Journal of Law and Society, vol 15, p.5.
7. Cretney, S.M. and Masson, J.M. (1997), Principles of Family Law (6th ed), Sweet and Maxwell, London.
8. Davis, G., Cretney, S and Collins, J. (1994), Simple Quarrels, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
9. Diduck, A. (1992), ‘Spousal Support’, in Family Law Update, Law Society of Manitoba Continuing Legal Education Series, VI-1.
10. Diduck, A. and Orton, H. (1994), ‘Equality and Support for Spouses’, Modern Law Review, vol 57(5), p.681.
11. Eekelaar, J. (1991), Regulating Divorce, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. Eekelaar, J. (1998), ‘Should Section 25 be Reformed?’, Family Law, p.469.
13. Ellman, I. M. (1997), ‘The Misguided Movement to Revive Fault Divorce, and Why Reformers Should Look Instead to the American Law Institute’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol 11, p.216.
14. Freeman, M.D.A. (1997), ‘Divorce Gospel Style’, Family Law, p.413.
15. Frenkel, J., District Judge (1997), ‘Ancillary Relief Pilot Scheme in Operation’, Family Law, p.726
16. George, P. (1997), ‘In all the Circumstances - Section 25', Family Law, p.729.
17. Gilligan, C. (1982), In A Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, and London.
18. Gray, C. and Merrick S.B. (1996), ‘Voice Alterations. Why Women Have More Difficulty Than Men With the Legal Process of Divorce’, Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol 34(2), p.240.
19. Hallam, C. and Salter, D. (1997), ‘Pensions on Divorce - Compensation or Needs?’, Family Law, p.608.
20. Ingleby, R. (1992), Solicitors and Divorce, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
21. King, A. (1998), ‘No Legal Aid Without Mediation - Section 29’, Family Law, p.331.
22. Lacey, N. (1998), ‘Feminist Legal Theory Beyond Neutrality’ in Unspeakable Subjects, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
23. Morris, A. and Nott, S. (1995), All My Worldly Goods: A Feminist Perspective on the Legal Regulation of Wealth, Dartmouth, Aldershot.
24. Mossman, M.J. (1994), ‘Gender Equality, Family Law and Access to Justice’, International Journal of Law and The Family, vol 8, p.357.
25. Naffine, N. (1990), Law and the Sexes, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
26. Pahl, J. (1989), Money and Marriage, Macmillian, Basingstoke and London.
27. Priest, J. (1997), ‘Capital Settlements and the CSA - Part I’, Family Law, p.l 15.
28. Rogerson, C. (1989), ‘The Causal Connection Test in Spousal Support Law’, Canadian Journal of Family Law, vol 8, p.95.
29. Smart, C. (1991), ‘The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody’, Journal of Law and Society, vol 18, p.485.
30. United Kingdom Men’s Movement (1997), ‘The United Kingdom Divorce Racket’, http://www.zynet.co.uk/gold/lymtel/ukmm/racket.htm.
31. Walker, J., McCarthy, P. and Timms, N. (1994), Mediation: the Making and Remaking of Cooperative Relationships, The Relate Centre for Family Studies, Newcastle.
32. Zander, M. (1997), ‘The Woolf Report: Forwards or Backwards for the New Lord Chancellor?’ Civil Justice Quarterly, vol 16, p.208.