Refusing Prenatal Diagnosis: The Uneven Meanings of Bioscience in a Multicultural World1

Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 143-167

  Rapp, Rayna ^a  

^a New School for Social Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85134913440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203948729-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Clarke, Adele, and Joan Fujimara, eds. 1992. The Right Tools for the Job: Materials, Instruments, Techniques and Work Organization in 20th Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Clarke, Adele, and Teresa Montini. 1993. “The Many Faces of RU486: Tales of Situated Knowledges and Technological Contestations.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 18 (1): 42-78.
3. Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 1992. “Genetic Technology and Reproductive Choice: An Ethics for Autonomy.” In The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, edited by Daniel J. Kevles and Leroy Hood, 244-263. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 1994. “Women’s Roles in the History of Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villi Sampling.” In Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, edited by Karen H. Rothenberg and Elizabeth J. Thomson, 35-48. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
5. Drugan, Arie, et al. 1990. “Determinants of Parental Decisions to Abort for Chromosome Abnormalities.” Prenatal Diagnosis 10: 483-490.
6. Hsu, Lillian. 1989. “The Prenatal Diagnosis Laboratory of the City of New York: A Tenth Anniversary Assessment.” Talk delivered at NYU Medical School, June 10.
7. Judson, Horace Freeland. 1992. “A History of the Science and Technology behind Gene Mapping and Sequencing.” In The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, edited by Daniel J. Kevles and Leroy Hood, 37-80. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. McNeil, Maureen. 1987. “Being Reasonable Feminists.” In Gender and Expertise, edited by Maureen McNeil, 13-61. London: Free Association Books.
9. Meaney, F. John, et al. 1993. “Providers and Consumers of Prenatal Genetic Testing Services: What Do the National Data Tell Us?" Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 8 (suppl. 1): 18-27.
10. Morgall, Janine Marie. 1993. Technology Assessment: A Feminist Perspective. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11. Palmer, Shane, et al. 1993. “Follow-up Survey of Pregnancies with Diagnoses of Chromosomal Abnormality.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 2: 139-152.
12. Rapp, Rayna. 1988. “Chromosomes and Communication: The Discourse of Genetic Counseling.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2: 143-157.
13. Rapp, Rayna. 1993. “Constructing Amniocentesis.” In Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life, edited by Shirley Lindenbaum and Margaret Lock, 54-76. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Rapp, Rayna. 1994. “Women’s Responses to Prenatal Diagnosis: A Sociocultural Perspective on Diversity.” In Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, edited by Karen H. Rothenberg and Elizabeth J. Thomson, 219-233. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
15. Rapp, Rayna. 1995. “Heredity or Revising the Facts of Life.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, edited by Carol Delaney and Sylvia Yanagisako, 69-86. New York: Routledge.
16. Rapp, Rayna. 1998. Moral Pioneers: Fetuses, Families, and Amniocentesis. New York: Routledge.
17. Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: W. W. Norton.
18. Wajcman, Judy. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
19. Yoxen, Edward. 1990. “Seeing with Sound: A Study of the Development of Medical Images.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 281-309. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.