A Model of User Acceptance of E-learning Technologies: a Case Study of a Polytechnic in New Zealand

Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI)

Volumn P-63, Issue , 2005, Pages 180-189

  Nanayakkara, Charith ^a   Whiddett, Dick ^b  

^a TOI OHOMAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

CASE-STUDIES; COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; E-LEARNING SYSTEMS; E-LEARNING TECHNOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; PRACTICE OF TEACHINGS; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; TEACHING AND LEARNING; USERS' ACCEPTANCE;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 85134565443     PISSN: 16175468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bates, T. (2000). Managing technological change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Davis, F. D. (1993). User Acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
3. Graves, W. H. (2001). The New Challenges of E-Learning. Ubiquity, 1(43). Communications of ACM. Retrieved 30 August, 2004, from: http://portal.acm.org.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/citation.cfm?id=359429&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=32263271&CFTOKEN=96032385
4. Hitt, C., & Hartman, L. (2002). Distributed learning: New challenges and opportunities for institutional leadership. Educause Quarterly, 25(4).
5. Inglis, A., Ling, P., & Loosten, V. (1999). Delivering digitally: Managing the transition to the knowledge media. London: Kogan Page.
6. Levine, A., & Sun, J. C. (2003). Barriers to Distance Education. American Council of Education/EDUCAUSE, 5(2).
7. NCES [National Centre for Educational Statistics]. (2002). Distance education instruction by post secondary faculty and staff (Vol. Fall 1998). US: Department of Education.
8. NCVER [National Center for Vocational Education Research]. (2000). Student outcomes survey.
9. Neil, T. (2004). Guiding principals for staff and student support (Unpublished document).
10. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2003). Interim e-learning framework. Wellington, New Zealand.
11. Nichols, M. (2003). APNZ e-learning forum survey preliminary analysis (Unpublished document).
12. Oblinger, D., Barone, C., & Hawkins, B. (2001). Distributed Education and Its Challenges: An Overview. Educause Quarterly, 5(31).
13. rd ed. New York: Free Press
14. th ed. New York: Free Press
15. Smith, T., & Rupp, F. (2004). Innovation in Open & Distance Learning: Kogan Page London.
16. Vankatesh, V., & Davis. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46.(2), 186.
17. Vrasidas, C. (2004). Issues of pedagogy and design in e-learning systems. Communications of ACM. Retrieved 31 August, 2004, from: http://portal.acm.org.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/citation.cfm?id=968086&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=32263271&CFTOKEN=96032385