EFFECTS OF SCREEN SIZE, SCREEN RESOLUTION, AND DISPLAY RATE ON COMPUTER-BASED TEST PERFORMANCE

ETS Research Report Series

Volumn 2001, Issue 2, 2001, Pages i-23

  Bridgeman, Brent ^a   Lennon, Mary Louise ^a   Jackenthal, Altamese ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

computer based testing; display; font size; latency; presentation; resolution; screen size; test performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85133472417     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23308516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2001.tb01865.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
2. College Entrance Examination Board. (1986). 10 SATs. New York: Author.
3. deBruijn, D., de Mul, S., & Van Oostendorp, H. (1992). The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text. Behaviour and Information Technology, 11 (2), 71–78.
4. Dillon, A., Richardson, J., & McKnight, C. (1990). The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9 (3), 215–227.
5. Haas, C. (1996). Writing Technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1985). Effects of text display variables on reading tasks: Computer screen vs. hard copy. (Carnegie-Mellon University Rep. No. CDC-TR3). Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie-Mellon University.