Optimal Swimming Behavior of Zooplankton

Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology and Physiology

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 365-374

  Dodson, Stanley I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85131032391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203733615-27     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Alcaraz, M. and Strickler, I R. (1988) Locomotion in copepods: pattern of movements and energetics of Cyclops. Hydrobiologia, 167, 409-414.
2. Blais, J. M. and Maly, E. J. (1994) Differential predation by Chaoborus americanus on males and females of two species of Diaptomus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sei., 50, 410-415.
3. Buchanan, C. and Goldberg, B. (1981) The action spectrum of Daphnia magna phototaxis in a simulated natural environment Photochem. Photobiol., 34, 711-717.
4. Buchanan, C, Goldberg, B. and McCartney, R. (1982) A laboratory method for studying zooplankton swimming behaviors. Hydrobiologia, 95, 77-89.
5. Buskey, E. J., Coulter, C and Strom, S. (1993) Locomotory patterns of microzooplankton: potential effects on food selectivity of larval fish. Bull. Mar. Science, 53, 29-43.
6. Confer, I L. and Blades, P. I. (1975). Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol. Oceanogr., 20, 571-579.
7. Dawidowicz, P. and Loose, C J. (1992) Cost of swimming by Daphnia during diel vertical migration. Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 665-667.
8. Dodson, S. I. (1974a) Zooplankton competition and predation: An experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology, 55, 605-613.
9. Dodson, S. I. (1974b) Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: A new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol. Oceanogr., 19, 721-729.
10. Dodson, S. I. (1989) Predator-induced reaction norms. ‘Bioscience, 39, 447-452.
11. Dodson, S. I. (1990) Predicting diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1195-1200.
12. Dodson, S. I., Hanazato, T. and Gorski, P. R. (1995) Behavioral responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to carbaryl and Chaoborus kairomone. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 13, in press.
13. Dodson, S. I. and Ramcharan, CW (1991) Size-specific swimming behavior of Daphnia pulex. J. Plankton Res., 13, 1365-1379.
14. Drenner, R. W, Strickler, J. R. and O’Brien, W J. (1978) Capture probability: The role of zooplankter escape in the selective feeding of planktivorous fish J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 35, 1370-1373.
15. Epp, R. W and Lewis, W M. (1984) Cost and speed of locomotion for rotifers. Oecologia, 61, 289-292.
16. Evans, G. T. (1989). The encounter speed of moving predator and prey. J. Plank. Res., 11, 415-417.
17. Fox, H. M. and Mitchell, Y (1953) Relation of the rate of antennal movement in Daphnia to the number of eggs carried in the brood pouch. J Exp. Biol, 30, 238-242.
18. Gerking, S. D. (1994) Feeding Ecology of Fish. Academic Press. New York. 416 p.
19. Gerritsen, J. (1980) Adaptive responses to encounter problems. In: Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, W C. Kerfoot, ed., University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. pp. 52-62.
20. Gerritsen, J. and Strickler, J. R. (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 34, 73-82.
21. Hamner, P. G. and Hamner, W H. (1993) In situ behavior of deep-sea animals: 3-D videography from submersibles and motion analysis. U.S. GLOBEC News No. 4-August 1993. pp 7-10.
22. Havel, J. E. and Dodson, S. I. (1984) Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: Behavioral observations. Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 487-494.
23. Ingle, D. (1968) Spatial dimensions of vision in fish. In: The Central Nervous System and Fish Behavior, D Ingle, ed., U. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 51-94.
24. Jacobs, X (1967) Untersuchungen zur Funktion und Evolution der Zyklomorphose bei Daphnia, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Selektion durch Fische. Arch. Hydrobiol., 62, 467-541.
25. Kerfoot, W C (1978) Combat between predatory copepods and their prey: Cyclops, Epischura, and Bosmina. Limnol Oceanogr., 23, 1089-1102.
26. Kerfoot, W C, Kellogg Jr., D. L. and Strickler, J. R. (1980) Visual observations of live zooplankters: Evasion, escape and chemical defenses. In: Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, W C. Kerfoot ed., University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. pp. 10-27.
27. Kerfoot, W C. and Peterson, C. (1979) Ecological interactions and evolutionary arguments: Investigations with predatory copepods and Bosmina. Fortschr. Zool., 25, 159-196.
28. Larsson, P. and Dodson, S. I. (1993) Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch. Hydrobiol., 129, 129-155.
29. Lampert, W (1987). Feeding and nutrition in Daphnia. In: Daphnia. R. H. Peters and R. De Bernardi, eds., Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol., 45, 143-192.
30. Lehman, J. T. (1976). The filter-feeder as an optimal forager, and the predicted shapes of feeding curves. Limnol. Oceanogr., 21, 501-516.
31. O’Brien, W J. (1987) Planktivory by freshwater fish. In: Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, eds. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. pp. 3-16.
32. Porter, K. G., Gerritsen, J. and Orcutt, Jr. J. D. (1982) The effect of food concentration on swimming patterns, feeding behavior, ingestion, assimilation, and respiration by Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 935-949.
33. Parejko, K. S. and Dodson, S. I. (1991) The evolutionary ecology of an antipredator reaction norm: Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus. Evolution, 45, 1665-1674.
34. Ramcharan, C. W and Sprules, W G. (1989) Preliminary results from an inexpensive motion analyzer for free-swimming zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 457-462.
35. Ramcharan, C. W and Sprules, W G. (1991) Predator-induced behavioral defense and its ecological consequences for two calanoid copepods. Oecologia, 86, 276-286.
36. Riessen, H. P. (1992). Cost-benefit model for the induction of an antipredator defense. The American Naturalist., 140, 349-362.
37. Riessen, H. P., Sommerville, J. W, Chiappaari, C. and Gustafson, D. (1988) Chaoborus predation, prey vulnerability, and their effect in zooplankton communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Set, 45, 1912-1920.
38. Ringelberg, J. (1987) Light induced behavior in Daphnia. In: Daphnia. R. H. Peters and R. De Bernardi, eds., Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol, 45, 285-323.
39. Ringelberg, J. (1991) Enhancement of the phototactic reaction in Daphnia hyalina by a chemical mediated by juvenile perch (Percafluviatilis). J. Plankton Res., 13, 17-25.
40. Smith, F. E. and Baylor, E. R. (1953) Color responses in the Cladocera and their ecological significance. Am. Nat., 87, 49-55.
41. Stearns, S. C. (1975) Light responses of Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Ocenaogr. 20, 564-570.
42. Stephens, D.W and Krebs, J. R. (1986) Foraging Theory Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. 247 p.
43. Threlkeld, S. T. (1987) Daphnia population fluctuations: patterns and mechanisms. In: Daphnia R. H. Peters and R. deBernardi, eds. Memorie dell’Istituto Italiano de Idrobiol. v. 45, pp. 367-388.
44. Williamson, C. E. (1983) Behavioral interactions between a cyclopoid copepod predator and its prey. J. Plankton Res., 5, 701-711.
45. Wright, D. I. and O’Brien, W J. (1984) The development and field test of a tactical model of the planktivorous feeding of white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Ecol. Monogr., 54, 65-98.
46. Zaret, T. M. (1980) The effect of prey motion on plankton choice. In: Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. C. Kerfoot, ed., University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. pp. 594-602.