THE SELECTION OF PRONUNCIATION VARIANTS: COMPARING THE PERFORMANCE OF MAN AND MACHINE

5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages

  Kessens, Judith M ^a   Wester, Mirjam ^a   Cucchiarini, Catia ^a   Strik, Helmer ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC TRANSCRIPTION; CONTINUOUS SPEECH; PERFORMANCE; PRONUNCIATION VARIANTS; RUNNING-IN; SPEECH RECOGNIZER;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 85128420719     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Shriberg, L.D., Kwiatkowski, J. and Hoffman, K. “A Procedure for Phonetic Transcription by Consensus,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27: 456-465, 1984.
2. Cucchiarini, C. Phonetic transcription: a methodological and empirical study, PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen 1993.
3. Booij, G. The Phonology of Dutch, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
4. Cucchiarini, C. and van den Heuvel, H. “/r/Deletion in Standard Dutch,” Proc. of the Dept. of Language & Speech, University of Nijmegen, Vol. 19: 59-65, 1995.
5. Strik, H., Russel, A., van den Heuvel, H., Cucchiarini, C. and Boves, L. “A Spoken Dialogue System for the Dutch Public Transport Information Service,” Int. Journal of Speech Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2: 119-129, 1997.
6. Wester, M., Kessens, J.M., and Strik, H. “Improving the Performance of a Dutch CSR by Modeling Pronunciation Variation,” Proc. of the Workshop Modeling Pronunciation Variation for Automatic Speech Recognition, Kerkrade, 145-150, 1998.
7. Rietveld, T. and van Hout, R. Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.