메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue , 2005, Pages 219-238

Planning for test performance Does it make a difference?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85127405281     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.11.14eld     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (39)

References (4)
  • 1
    • 85180975784 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Structure was operationalized in terms of the amount of information provided to the learners to assist them doing the task. Familiarity was operationalized according to whether the task activity was an activity with which the learners would reasonably be expected to be familiar Wigglesworth 86
    • Structure was operationalized in terms of the amount of information provided to the learners to assist them doing the task. Familiarity was operationalized according to whether the task activity was an activity with which the learners would reasonably be expected to be familiar (Wigglesworth 2000:86).
    • (2000)
  • 3
    • 85181027402 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Most students lived with Australian host-families, and so unless their host families speak the students’ native language, they had to speak English at home
    • Most students lived with Australian host-families, and so unless their host families speak the students’ native language, they had to speak English at home.
  • 4
    • 85180967285 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A c-unit was defined as a simple clause, or an independent subclausal unit, together with the subordinate clauses associated with them Forster, Tonkyn & Wigglesworth
    • A c-unit was defined as a simple clause, or an independent subclausal unit, together with the subordinate clauses associated with them (Forster, Tonkyn & Wigglesworth 2000).
    • (2000)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.