Functional grammar: On the value and limitations of dependability, inference, and generalizibility

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 12, Issue , 2006, Pages 115-133

  Larsen Freeman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127238367     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Bard, E., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32-68.
2. Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
3. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: CUP.
4. Bolinger, D. (1968). Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa, 2(2), 119-127.
5. Breivik, L. (1981). On the interpretation of existential there. Language, 57(1), 1-25.
6. Celce-Murcia, M. (1980). Contextual analysis of English: Application to TESL. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 41-55). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7. Celce-Murcia, M. (1990). Data-based language analysis and TESL. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Proceedings of Georgetown University roundtable on languages and linguistics 1990 (pp. 245-259). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
9. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10. Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Givón, T. (1980). The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language, 4(3), 333-377.
12. Givón, T. (1999). Generativity and variation: The notion of “rule of grammar” revisited. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 81-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Hunston, S. & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Kennedy, G. (2003). Amplifier collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 467-487.
15. Kim, K.-H. (1995). WH-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation: Cases of topicalization. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 245-296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Knowles, P. (1979). Predicate markers: A new look at the English predicate system. Cross Currents, VI(2), 21-36.
17. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
18. Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Newbury House/HarperCollins.
20. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
21. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Grammar: Rules and reasons working together. ESL/EFL Magazine, January/February, 10-12.
22. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
23. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). Enhancing contextual analysis through the use of linguistic corpora. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
24. Larsen-Freeman, D., Kuehn, T., & Haccius, M. (2002). Helping students make appropriate English verb tense-aspect choices. TESOL Journal, 11(4), 3-9.
25. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
26. Michigan Corpus of Spoken Academic English. English Language Institute. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Website: www.hti.umich.edu/m/micase
27. Newmeyer, F. (2003). Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Presidential address delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Atlanta, January.
28. Rutherford, W. (1983). Language typology and language transfer. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 358-370). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
29. Sasaki, M. (1990). Topic prominence in Japanese EFL students' existential constructions. Language Learning, 40(3), 333-368.
30. Schachter, J. & Rutherford, W. (1979). Discourse function and language transfer. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 19, 1-12.
31. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
32. Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
33. Williams, H. (1996). An analysis of conjunctive adverbial expressions in English. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
34. Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.