NEPA and environmental planning: Tools, techniques, and approaches for practitioners

NEPA and Environmental Planning: Tools, Techniques, and Approaches for Practitioners

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-448

  Eccleston, Charles H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126498354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (97)

1. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, Chapter 9, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.
2. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA's EA, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
3. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
4. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, Chapter 5, John Wiley & Sons, New York (www.wiley.com), 1999.
5. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA's EA, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL (www.crcpress.com), 2001.
6. CEQ, The NEPA Task Force Report to the Council on Environmental Quality Modernizing NEPA Implementation, http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/ntf/report/htmltoc.html (accessed March 3, 2007).
7. Fairfax S.K., B. T. Andrews, Debate within and debate without: NEPA and the redefinition of the prudent-man rule, Natural Resources Journal, 19, 521, 1979.
8. Tuckfield, D. J., Attempts to avoid NEPA: Is it bad faith? National Association of Environmental Professionals Conference Proceedings, Session M5A, 672-679, 1995.
9. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Clark Boardman Callaghan, New York, 1998.
10. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000, p. 27.
11. Miles L.D., Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
12. Eccleston C.H., Applying value engineering and modern assessment tools in managing NEPA: Improving effectiveness of the NEPA scoping and planning process, Environmental Regulations and Permitting, Winter 1998, pp. 53-63.
13. Schmidt O.L., The statement of purpose and need defines the range of alternatives in environmental documents, 18 Environmental Law 371-81, 1988.
14. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
15. Eccleston C.H., A strategy for efficiently implementing pollution prevention program through the NEPA planning process, Journal of Environmental Quality Management, 15(3), pp. 31-41, Spring 2006.
16. Eccleston C.H., A strategy for integrating NEPA with an EMS and ISO-14000, Environmental Quality Management Journal, Spring 1998.
17. Eccleston C.H., R. B. Smythe, Integrating environmental impact assessment with environmental management systems, Environmental Quality Management Journal (Lead Journal Article), 11(4), Summer 2002.
18. Eccleston C.H., Integrating NEPA's concept of adaptive management with an ISO 14000 consistent EMS, Environmental Quality Management Journal, 12(3), Spring 2003, pp. 59-67.
19. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999, pp. 81-82 and p. 241.
20. Eccleston C.H., NEPA: Determining when an analysis contains sufficient detail to provide adequate NEPA coverage for a proposed action, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Summer 1995.
21. Mandelker, D. R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Chapter 10, Clark Boardman Callaghan, Deerfield, IL, 1993.
22. Lillie T.H., Lindenhofen H.E., Military construction and the environment: NEPA as a blueprint for compliance, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Winter 1991/1992.
23. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999, Chapter 9.
24. Yost N.C., Testimony Before the Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives, Hearing on NEPA: Lessons Learned and Next Steps, November 17, 2005.
25. Blaug E.A, Use of the environmental assessment by federal agencies in NEPA implementation, The Environmental Professional, 15, 1993, pp. 57-65.
26. Bausch C., A simple formula for crafting better NEPA documents, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Autumn 1992.
27. Lillie, T.H., Lindenhofen, H.E., NEPA as a tool for reducing risk to programs and program managers, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Spring 1991.
28. Lillie T.H., Bowman S., NEPA compliance for Air Force space systems division programs, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, 1(4), Winter 1990/1991.
29. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Clark Boardman Callaghan, New York, 1992.
30. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA's EA, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
31. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 2000.
32. Leopold, L. B., et al., A Procedure for Evaluating Environmental Impact. United States Geological Survey, Geological Survey Circular No. 645, Washington, D.C., 1971.
33. Bovee, K. D., T. J. Newcomb, and T.G. Coon. 1994. Relations between habitat variability and population dynamics of bass in the Huron River, Michigan. National Biological Survey Biological Report 21, 63 pp.
34. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., Buhl, S. L., Underestimating costs in public works projects: error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), Summer 2002.
35. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., Buhl, S. L., How (In)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), Spring 2005.
36. Yost N.C., Testimony before the Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives, Hearing on NEPA: Lessons Learned and Next Steps, November 17, 2005.
37. Lillie T.H., Lindenhofen H.E., NEPA as a tool for reducing risk to programs and program managers, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Spring 1991.
38. Swenson R.T., Desert storm, desert flood: A guide to emergency and other exemptions from NEPA and other environmental laws, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Spring 1991.
39. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Section 5.03(1), Clark Boardman Callaghan, New York, 1998.
40. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Clark Boardman Callaghan, New York, 1992.
41. Eccleston C.H., Williamson B.D., Determining when NEPA applies to nonfederal activities, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, Winter 1997.
42. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, 2nd edition, New York, 1992.
43. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA EAs, CRC/ Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
44. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
45. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.
46. Davis R., National Environmental Policy Act, Presented as part of Government Institutes, Inc. class on Environmental Laws and Regulations, Richland, WA, September 1987.
47. Eccleston C.H., The Cilix methodology: a practical methodology for assessing cumulative impacts in environmental assessments, Journal of Federal Facilities Environmental Management, pp. 37-44, Winter 2006.
48. Huber K.D., NEPA: mitigation and the need for an environmental impact statement, Federal Facilities Journal, 1(2), Summer 1990
49. Daniels S.E., Kelly C.M., Deciding between an EA and an EIS may be a question of mitigation, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 5(4), March 1991.
50. Eccleston C.H., Environmental Impact Statements: A Comprehensive Guide to Project and Strategic Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
51. Eccleston C.H., Decision-identification tree-a new NEPA scoping tool, Journal of Environmental Management, University of Massachusetts, 26(4), pp. 457-464, 2000.
52. Fogleman V.M., Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act Interpretations, Applications, and Compliance, Quorum Books (1990).
53. Mandelker D.R., NEPA Law and Litigation, Clark Boardman Callaghan, New York, 4.12.
54. Eccleston C.H., Determining if a change to a proposal requires additional NEPA documentation-the Smithsonian Solution, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, pp. 119-132, Spring 1999.
55. Mandelker D.R., NEPA alive and well: the Supreme Court takes two, Environmental Law Reporter, September 1989.
56. Odum W.E., Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions, Bioscience, 33, 728-729, 1982.
57. Smith M.D., An analysis of recent NEPA cumulative impact assessment case law, Environmental Practice Journal, 8(4), December 2006.
58. Eccleston C.H., Applying the significant departure principle in resolving the cumulative impact paradox, Journal of Environmental Practice, 8(4), December 2006.
59. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA EAs, Chapter 8, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
60. Thompson J.G., Williams G., Social assessment: roles for practitioners and the need for stronger mandates, Impact Assessment Bulletin, 10(3), 1992.
61. Saylor R.E., McCold L.N., Bounding analyses in NEPA documents: when are they appropriate? The Environmental Professional, National Association of Environmental Professionals, 16, 285-291, 1994.
62. Yost N.C., Administrative implementation of and judicial review under the National Environmental Policy Act, Law of Environmental Protection, S. Novick ed., 1987.
63. Eccleston C.H., Determining if and when impacts of potential accidents need to be evaluated in a NEPA analysis, Environmental Practice-The Journal of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, August 1999.
64. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA EAs, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
65. Eccleston C.H., How NEPA can be used to counter terrorism, Journal of Environmental Practice: Special Issue on the National Environmental Policy Act, Vol. 5(4), December 2003.
66. Eccleston C.H., NEPA and terrorism: is it time for a paradigm shift? Federal Facilities Environmental Journal (Lead journal article), Vol. 13(2), Summer 2002.
67. Eccleston C.H., Effective Environmental Assessments: How to Manage and Prepare NEPA's EA, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
68. March F., Determining the significance of proposed actions, National Association of Environmental Professionals 21st Annual Conference Proceedings, NEPA Symposium, Session TC3, p. 421, 1996.
69. March F., NEPA Effectiveness: Mastering the Process, Section 3.3.7, Government Institutes, Rockville, MD, 1998.
70. Eccleston C.H., The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with Emphasis on Efficiency, Chapter 8, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 1999.
71. Eccleston C.H., Determining if and when impacts of potential accidents need to be evaluated in a NEPA analysis, Environmental Practice-The Journal of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, August 1999.
72. http://www.iwar.org.uk/infocon/business-continuity-planning.htm.
73. http://howe.stevens.edu/Research/ATT/ReportAllSep1004_v3.pdf.
74. Biswas A.K., Agarwala S.B. C. (eds.) (1992). Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.
75. Canter L.W. (1996). Environmental Impact Assessment, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
76. OECD (1992). Good Practices for Environmental Impact Assessment of Developing Projects. Development Assistance Committee, Paris.
77. UNEP (1988). Environmental Impact Assessment: Basic Procedures for Developing Countries, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.
78. World Bank (1991). Environmental Impact Assessment Sourcebook (vols. 1-3), World Bank, Washington, D.C.
79. Norman L., George C. (2000). Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.
80. Christopher W. (2003). Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall (Pearson Education), Harlow, U.K.
81. Therivel R., Wilson E., Thompson S., Heaney D., Pritchard D. (1992). Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London.
82. Sadler B. (1995). Towards the Improved Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Executive Summary of Interim Report Prepared for IAIA 95. Durban, South Africa.
83. Sadler B., Verheem R. (1996). Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges and Future Directions, the Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
84. McDonald G.T., Brown L. (1995). Going beyond environmental impact assessment: Environmental input to planning and design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 483-495.
85. Hardin G., The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1968, 1243-1248.
86. Hardin G., The tragedy of the commons, Science 162, 1968.
87. Malthus T., An Essay on the Principle of Population, June 7, 1798. Available from www.amazon.com.
88. Malthus T., An Essay on the Principle of Population, Chapter 8, 1798. Available from www.amazon.com.
89. Donella M., Dennis M., Randers J., et al., Limits to Growth (commissioned by the Club of Rome), 1972.
90. Doolittle F., Is Nature Really Motherly? CoEvolution Quarterly, Spring 1981.
91. Thomas L., Lives of a Cell, Bantam Books, New York, 1980.
92. Jones D., Jones Sustainability North America Index Guide Book, Section 3.1, Version 2.0, August 2006.
93. Toth F.L., Mwandosya M., Chapter 10: Decision-Making Frameworks, IPCC WGIII Third Assessment Report.
94. Wells T., Wild Man: the Life and Times of Daniel Ellsberg, Palgrave, New York, 2001.
95. Sahakian C.E., The Delphi Method, Corporate Partnering Institute, Skokie, IL, 1997.
96. Johansson P.O., Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2003.
97. Boardman A., Greenberg D., Vining A., et al., Cost Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005.