Location Data, Purpose Binding and Contextual Integrity: What’s the Message?

Law, Governance and Technology Series

Volumn 17, Issue , 2014, Pages 31-62

  Hildebrandt, Mireille ^a,b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Contextual integrity; Cybernetics; Ethics; Inferences; Inferred data; Location privacy; Messages; Observed data; Purpose binding; Rule of Law; Volunteered data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125956358     PISSN: 23521902     EISSN: 23521910     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Amoore, Louise. 2011. Data derivatives. On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6): 24–43 (1 November).
2. Altman, Irwin. 1975. The environment and social behavior: Privacy personal space territory crowding. Montery: Brooks/Cole.
3. Beresford, Alastair R., and Frank Stajano. 2003. Location privacy in pervasive computing. Pervasive Computing 2 (1): 46–55 (January–March).
4. boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2011. Six provocations for big data. SSRN scholarly paper ID 1926431. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1926431. Accessed 9 April 2014.
5. Cohen, Julie E. 2007. Cyberspace as/and space. Columbia Law Review 107:210–256.
6. De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth. 2006. Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In Privacy and the criminal law, eds. Erik Claes, Antony Duff and S. Gutwirth. Oxford: Intersentia (pp. 61–104).
7. Dubber, Markus Dirk, and Mariana Valverde. 2006. The new police science: The police science in domestic and international governance. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
8. Esposito, Elena. 2011. The future of futures: The time of money in financing and society. UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
9. Floridi, Luciano, and J. W. Sanders. 2004. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3): 349–379.
10. Galison, Peter. 1990. Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical positivism and architectural modernism. Critical Inquiry 16 (4): 709–752.
11. Gitelman, Lisa. ed. 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Gordon, John. 1984. The Alice and Bob after dinner speech. http://downlode.org/Etext/alicebob. html. Accessed 9 April 2014.
13. Greenfield, Adam. 2006. Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley: New Riders.
14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Studies in contemporary German social thought). Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Hildebrandt, M. 2008a. Profiling and the identity of the European citizen. In Profiling the European citizen. Cross-discplinary perspectives, eds. M. Hildebrandt and S Gutwirth. Dordrecht: Springer (pp. 303–343).
17. Hildebrandt, M. 2008b. Governance, governmentality, police and Justice: A new science of police. Buffalo Law Review 56 (2): 557–598.
18. Hildebrandt, M. 2011. Criminal liability and ‘Smart’ environments. In Philosophical foundations of criminal law, eds. Duff Antony and Green Stuart, 507–532. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
19. Hildebrandt, M. 2013a. Slaves to Big Data. Or Are We? IDP. Rrvista De Internet, Derecho Y Po-litica 16 (forthcoming 2014). http://works.bepress.com/mireille_hildebrandt/52.
20. Hildebrandt, M. 2013b. Profile transparency by design: Re-enabling double contingency. In Privacy, due process and the computational turn: The philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology (Hardback)-Routledge, eds. M Hildebrandt and E. De Vries. Abingdon: Routledge (pp. 221–246).
21. Hildebrandt, M. 2013c Legal protection by design in the smart grid. Report commissioned by the Smart Energy Collective (SEC). Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
22. Hill, Kashmir. 2013. Facebook joins forces with data brokers to gather more intel about users for ads. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/02/27/facebook-joins-forces-with-data-brokers-to-gather-more-intel-about-users-for-ads/. Accessed 27 Feb 2013.
23. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology; an introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.
24. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to Earth (The Indiana series in the philosophy of technology). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
25. Ihde, Don. 2008. Ironic technics. Denmark: Automatic Press.
26. Leeuw, Karl Maria Michael de, and Jan Bergstra, eds. 2007. The history of information security: A comprehensive handbook. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
27. Masiello, Betsy, and Alma Whitten. 2010. Engineering Privacy in an Age of Information Abundance. In AAAI Spring Symposium Series, 2010, http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS10/paper/view/1188.
28. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
29. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phénoménologie de La Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
30. Morozov, E., and Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
31. Nissenbaum, H. F. 2010. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.
32. Prins, Corien. 2006. When personal data, behavior and virtual identities become a commodity: Would a property rights approach matter? SCRIPT-Ed 3 (4): 270–303.
33. Purtova, Nadezhda. 2012. Property rights in personal data: A European perspective. Alphen aan den Rijn. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
34. Radbruch, Gustav. 1950. Rechtsphilosophie. Herausgegeven von Erik Wolf. Stuttgart: Koehler.
35. Radbruch, Gustav. 2006. Five minutes of legal philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1): 13–15. http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/1/13.short. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
36. Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. Interpretation theory. Texas: Texas Univ. Press.
37. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–114.
38. Schönfeld, K.M. 2008. Rex, Lex et Judex: Montesquieu and La Bouche de La Loi Revisted. European Constitutional Law Review 4:274–301.
39. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40. Vanderstraeten, Raf. 2007. Parsons, Luhmann and the theorem of double contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology 2 (1): 77–92.
41. Varela, F.J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2006. Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Science Technology & Human Values 31 (3): 361–380.
43. Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44. World Economic Forum. 2011. Personal data: The emergence of a new asset class. http://www. weforum.org/issues/rethinking-personal-data. Accessed 9 April 2014.
45. World Economic Forum. 2012. Rethinking personal data: Strengthening trust. http://www. weforum.org/issues/rethinking-personal-data. Accessed 9 April 2014.