International progress in marine spatial planning

Ocean Yearbook Online

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 171-212

  Jay, Stephen ^a   Flannery, Wesley ^b   Vince, Joanna ^c   Liu, Wen Hong ^d   Xue, Julia Guifang ^e   Matczak, Magdalena ^f   Zaucha, Jacek ^f   Janssen, Holger ^g   van Tatenhove, Jan ^h   Toonen, Hilde ^h   Morf, Andrea ⁱ   Olsen, Erik ^j   de Vivero, Juan Luis Suárez ^k   Mateos, Juan Carlos Rodríguez ^k   Calado, Helena ^l   Duff, John ^m   Dean, Hanna ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KAOHSIUNG   (Taiwan)

^e OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^f GDYNIA MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^g LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR BALTIC SEA RESEARCH   (Germany)

^h WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences   (Sweden)

^j INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^l UNIVERSITY OF THE AZORES   (Portugal)

^m UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125633474     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22116001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22116001-90000159     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Agenda 21, adopted at UNCED Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992, available online: .
2. Johannesburg Plan of Implementation, available online: .
3. L. Veitch, N.K. Dulvy, H. Koldewey, S. Lieberman, D. Pauly, C.M. Roberts, A.D. Rogers and J.E.M. Baillie, “Avoiding empty ocean commitments at Rio+20,” Science 336 (2012): 1383-1385.
4. Report on the work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its twelfth meeting, A/66/186, available online: .
5. Rio+20: The Future We Want, available online: .
6. Global Partnership and Capacity Building for Ecosystem-Based Management of Oceans and Coasts - Pursuing Compatible Objectives for Sustainable Development through Integrated Spatial Planning, Management and Policies, available online: .
7. F. Douvere, “The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management,” Marine Policy 32 (2008): 762-771.
8. N. Schaefer and V. Barale, “Maritime spatial planning: Opportunities and challenges in the framework of the EU integrated maritime policy,” Journal of Coastal Conservation 15 (2011): 237-245.
9. S. Jay, “Built at sea: Marine management and the construction of marine spatial planning,” Town Planning Review 81 (2010): 173-191.
10. J. Day, “Zoning: Lessons from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park,” Ocean and Coastal Management 45 (2002): 139-156.
11. W. Flannery and M. Ó Cinnéide, “Stakeholder participation in marine spatial planning: Lessons from the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary,” Society and Natural Resources 25 (2012): 727-742.
12. P. Gilliland and D. Laffoley, “Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning,” Marine Policy 32 (2008): 787-796.
13. S. Kidd, A. Plater and C. Frid, eds., The Ecosystem Approach to Marine Planning and Management (London: Earthscan, 2011).
14. H. Smith, F. Maes, T. Stojanovic and R. Ballinger, “The integration of land and marine spatial planning,” Journal of Coastal Conservation 15 (2011): 291-303.
15. W. Flannery and M. Ó Cinnéide, “Marine spatial planning from the perspective of a small seaside community in Ireland,” Marine Policy 32 (2008): 980-987;
16. G.W. Allison, J. Lubchenco and M.H. Carr, “Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation,” Ecological Applications 8 (1998): S79-S92.
17. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), OJ L 164, (2008): 19-40.
18. E.M. De Santo, “Whose science? Precaution and power-play in European marine environmental decision-making,” Marine Policy 34 (2010): 414-420.
19. European Commission, Study on the Economic Effects of Maritime Spatial Planning (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011).
20. C. Ehler and F. Douvere, Visions for a Sea Change, Report of the First International Workshop on Marine Spatial Planning, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme, UNESCO, Paris, 2007, available online: .
21. P. Drankier, “Embedding maritime spatial planning in national legal frameworks,” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (2012): 7-27.
22. HELCOM & OSPAR, Towards an Ecosystem Approach to the Management of Human Activities, statement of the first joint ministerial meeting of the Helsinki and OSPAR Commissions, Bremen 25-26 June, 2003, available online: ;
23. H. Backer, “Transboundary maritime spatial planning: A Baltic Sea perspective,” Journal of Coastal Conservation 15 (2011): 279-289.
24. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles in the EU, COM 791 (Brussels: CEC, 2008), available online: .
25. F. Douvere and F. Maes, “The contribution of marine spatial planning to implementing integrated coastal zone management,” in Coastal Zone Management, D. Green, ed., (London: Thomas Telford, 2009), pp. 13-30.
26. A. Schultz-Zehden, K. Gee and K. Scibior, Handbook on Integrated Maritime Spatial Planning, available online: ; Smith et al., n. 17 above.
27. Maritime Spatial Planning in the EU: Achievements and Future Development, available online: .
28. C. Ehler and F. Douvere, Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach Toward Ecosystem-based Management, (Paris: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme, UNESCO, 2009), available online: .
29. Department of the Attorney General, The Offshore Constitutional Settlement: A Milestone in Cooperative Federalism (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1980).
30. Commonwealth of Australia, Australia's Oceans Policy: Caring, Understanding and Using Wisely (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1998).
31. EPBC Act, Act No. 91 of 1999, ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00685.
32. J. Vince, “The South East Regional Marine Plan: Implementing Australia's Oceans Policy,” Marine Policy 30 (2006): 420-430.
33. TFG International, Review of the Implementation of Oceans Policy (Hobart: TFG International, 2006).
34. South-east Marine Region, available online: .
35. See map online: .
36. R. Kenchington and J. Day, “Zoning, a fundamental cornerstone of effective marine spatial planning: Lessons learnt from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia,” Journal of Coastal Conservation 15 (2011): 271-278.
37. J.T. Hatton, S. Cork, P. Harper, R. Joy, P. Kanowski, R. Mackay, N. McKenzie and T. Ward, State of the Environment 2011, Department of Sustainability, Water, Population and Communities (Department of Sustainability, Water, Population and Communities: Canberra, 2011).
38. A. McMeekin, “Australia's ocean to be protected under a Gillard Government plan to add 44 large-scale marine reserves,” The Daily Telegraph (June 14, 2012).
39. L.K. Chien, W.Y. Chiu and H.C. Li, Sea Area Functional Zoning and Management Works (Taipei: Construction and Planning Agency, 2008);
40. C.C. Chu, Ocean Zoning and Planning (Beijing: Ocean Press, 2008).
41. W.H. Liu, C.C. Wu, H.T. Jhan and C.H. Ho, “The role of local government in marine spatial planning and management in Taiwan,” Marine Policy 35 (2011): 105-115.
42. S.J. Boyes, M. Elliott, S.M. Thomson, S. Atkins and P. Gilliland, “A proposed multiple-use zoning scheme for the Irish Sea: An interpretation of current legislation with GIS-based zoning approaches and effectiveness for the protection of nature conservation interests,” Marine Policy 31 (2007): 287-298.
43. W.Y. Chiau, “Marine territory planning: Vision, scope, and key issues,” City and Planning 34 (2007): 241-272.
44. W.H. Liu and C.C. Wu, Marine Spatial Planning and Management in Taiwan (II) (Taipei: National Science Council, 2009).
45. H. Li, “China's Sustainable Ocean and Coastal Development Strategy in 21st Century,” available online: .
46. Y. Liu, A. Feng and S. Wu, “Assessment methods and case study of the implementation of marine functional zoning,” Ocean Development and Management (in Chinese) 26 (2009): 12-17.
47. Technical Guidelines for Marine Functional Zoning GB17108 (1997), GB/T17108 (2006), available online: .
48. Law of PRC on the Use of Sea Areas (Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2001).
49. National Marine Functional Zoning (2001-2010), available online: .
50. W. Luan and D.A. “The fundamental programs of marine functional zoning of China,” Human Geography (in Chinese) 17 (2002): 93-95.
51. National Marine Functional Zoning (2011-2020), available online: .
52. H. Li, “The impacts and implication of the legal framework for sea use planning and management in China,” Ocean and Coastal Management 49 (2006): 717-726.
53. P. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, W. Chen and H. Hong “Discussion on Legislation of Marine Functional Zoning in China,” Marine Environmental Science (in Chinese) 25 (2006): 89-91.
54. A. Cieślak, K. Ścibior, P. Jakubowska, A. Staśkiewicz and J. Zaucha, eds., Compendium on Maritime Spatial Planning Systems in the Baltic Sea Region (Gdańsk: Maritime Institute, 2009), available online: .
55. J. Zaucha, ed., Pilot Draft Plan for the West Part of the Gulf of Gdańsk. First Maritime Spatial Plan in Poland (Gdańsk: Maritime Institute, 2009), available online: .
56. J. Zaucha and M. Matczak, Developing a Pilot Maritime Spatial Plan for the Southern Middle Bank (Gdańsk: Maritime Institute, 2011), available online: .
57. B. Käppeler, S. Toben, G. Chmura, S. Walkowicz, N. Nolte, P. Schmidt, J. Lamp, C. Göke and C. Mohn, “Developing a Pilot Maritime Spatial Plan for the Pomeranian Bight and Arkona Basin,” (2011), available online: .
58. M. Schubert, “Rechtliche Aspekte der maritimen Raumordnung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fischerei,” in Marine Raumordnung - Interessenkonflikt mit der Fischerei oder Werkzeug für das Management, M. Lukowicz and V. Hilge, eds., (Hamburg: Arbeiten des Deutschen Fischerei-Verbandes, 2009), pp. 51-82.
59. M. Kment, “Raumordnungsgebiete in der deutschen Ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone - Ein Plädoyer für eine Novelle nach der Novelle,” Die Verwaltung 40 (2007): 53-74.
60. N. Nolte, “Nutzungsansprüche und Raumordnung auf dem Meer,” Hansa International Maritime Journal 9 (2010): 79-83.
61. W. Erbguth, M. Schubert, C. Grünwald, W. Hülsmann, H. Janssen, A. Kannen, J. Lamp, N. Nolte and R. Wenk, Maritime Raumordnung - Interessenlage, Rechtslage, Praxis, Fortentwicklung (Hannover: ARL, 2012).
62. S. Jay, T. Klenke, F. Ahlhorn and H. Ritchie, “Early European experience in marine spatial planning: Planning the German exclusive economic zone,” European Planning Studies (2012): (in press).
63. Interdepartementaal Directeurenoverleg Noordzee, Integraal Beheerplan Noordzee 2015, (The Hague: Interdepartementaal Directeurenoverleg Noordzee, 2008).
64. Interdepartementaal Directeurenoverleg Noordzee, Integraal Beheerplan Noordzee 2015 Herziening, (The Hague: Interdepartementaal Directeurenoverleg Noordzee, 2011).
65. F. Douvere and C. Ehler, “Ecosystem-based marine spatial planning: An evolving paradigm for the management of coastal and marine places,” Ocean Yearbook 23 (2009): 1-26.
66. S. Jay, “Planners to the rescue: Spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy,” Marine Pollution Bulletin 60 (2010): 493-499;
67. J. Van Leeuwen, “Who greens the waves? Changing authority in the environmental governance of shipping and offshore oil and gas production,” (Ph.D. diss., Wageningen University, 2010);
68. J. van Tatenhove, “The Tide is Turning: The Rise of Legitimate EU Marine Governance,” (Lecture, Wageningen University, 27 October 2011).
69. E.K. Van Haastrecht and H.M. Toonen, “Science-policy interactions in MPA site selection in the Dutch part of the North Sea,” Environmental Management 47 (2011): 656-670.
70. The Swedish Planning and Building Act (SFS 1987:10).
71. SOU 2010:91, Governmental Inquiry on MSP: Planning In Depth - Marine Spatial Planning (Stockholm: SOU, 2010).
72. Visit SwAM online: for progress on marine plan areas.
73. H. Ackefors and K. Grip, The Swedish Model for Coastal Zone Management, Report 4455 (Stockholm: Swedish EPA, 1995).
74. A. Morf, “Participation and Planning in the Management of Coastal Resource Conflicts: Case Studies in West Swedish Municipalities,” (Ph.D. diss., University of Gothenburg, 2006).
75. A. Morf, National and Regional Strategies with Relevance for Swedish Maritime Space, BaltSeaPlan Report 7 (Gothenburg: Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment, 2012).
76. E. Olsen, H. Gjøsæter, I. Røttingen, A. Dommasnes, P. Fossum and P. Sandberg, “The Norwegian ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents Sea,” ICES Journal of Marine Science 64 (2007): 599-602;
77. G. Ottersen, E. Olsen, G.I. van der Meeren, A. Dommasnes and H. Loeng, “The Norwegian plan for integrated ecosystem-based management of the marine environment in the Norwegian Sea,” Marine Policy 35 (2011): 389-398.
78. Ministry of Environment, St.meld.nr. 8 (2005-2006) Helhetlig forvaltning av det marine miljø i Barentshavet og havområdene utenfor Lofoten (forvaltningsplan) (Oslo: Ministry of Environment, 2006);
79. Ministry of Environment, Meld.St.10 (2010-2011) Oppdatering av forvaltningsplanen for det marine miljø i Barentshavet og havområdene utenfor Lofoten (Oslo: Ministry of Environment, 2011).
80. Ministry of Environment, Helhetlig forvaltning av det marine miljø i Norskehavet (forvaltningsplan) (Oslo: Ministry of Environment, 2009).
81. Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 c. 23 (Norwich: The Stationary Office); Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 asp 5 (Norwich: The Stationary Office).
82. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Safeguarding Our Seas: A Strategy for the Conservation and Sustainable Development of our Marine Environment (London: DEFRA, 2002);
83. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, A Sea Change: A Marine Bill White Paper, Cm 7047, (London: DEFRA, 2007);
84. HM Government, Draft Marine Bill, Cm 7351, (Norwich: The Stationary Office, 2008);
85. MSPP Consortium (2006) Marine Spatial Planning Pilot: Final Report, unpublished document.
86. S. Jay, “Mobilising for marine wind energy in the United Kingdom,” Energy Policy 39 (2011): 4125-4133.
87. HM Government, Northern Ireland Executive, Scottish Government & Welsh Assembly Government, UK Marine Policy Statement (Norwich: The Stationary Office, 2011).
88. See map online: .
89. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Implementing Marine Planning (London: DEFRA, 2009);
90. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, A Description of the Marine Planning System for England (London: DEFRA, 2011).
91. T. Appleby and P. Jones, “The Marine and Coastal Access Act: A hornets' nest?,” Marine Policy 36 (2012): 73-77.
92. Act on the Protection of the Marine Environment: Act 41/2010 of December 29, BOE n° 317 December 30, 2010.
93. Revista Ambienta, N° 94, marzo 2011. Madrid, Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente.
94. J.L. Suárez and J.C. Rodríguez, “Factores geopolíticos de la planificación espacial marina: territorio y política marítima,” in La ordenación jurídica del medio marino en España. Estudios sobre la Ley 41/2010 sobre protección del medio marino, E. Arana and F.J. Sanz Larruga, eds., (Madrid: Cívitas-Thomson Reuters, 2012), pp. 601-646.
95. C.F. Santos, Z.G. Teixeira, J. Janeiro, R.S. Gonçalves, R. Bjorkland and M. Orbach, “The European Marine Strategy: Contribution and challenges from a Portuguese perspective,” Marine Policy 36 (2012): 963-968.
96. H. Calado, K. Ng, D. Johnson, L. Sousa, M. Phillips and F. Alves, “Marine spatial planning: Lessons learned from the Portuguese debate,” Marine Policy 34 (2010): 1341-1349.
97. H. Calado, K. Ng, C. Lopes and L. Paramio, “Introducing a legal management instrument for offshore marine protected areas in the Azores - The Azores Marine Park,” Journal of Environmental Science and Policy 14 (2011): 1175-1187.
98. T. Hall, M. Maclean, S. Coffen-Smout, and G. Herbert, “Advancing objectives-based, integrated ocean management through marine spatial planning: Current and future directions on the Scotian Shelf off Nova Scotia, Canada,” Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15 (2011): 247-255.
99. W. Flannery and M. Ó Cinnéide, “Deriving lessons relating to marine spatial planning from Canada's Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management Initiative,” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (2011): 97-117.
100. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Ocean Management Plan (Dartmouth, NS: Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 2007), p. 5.
101. Government of Canada, National Framework for Canada's Network of Marine Protected Areas (Ottawa: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2007).
102. Government of Canada, Canada's Oceans Strategy, (Ottawa: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2002).
103. Canada's Oceans Action Plan, available online: .
104. Health of the Oceans Initiatives, available online: .
105. Transformation at Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Memorandum issued to all DFO employees 13 October 2011, available online: .
106. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, United States Code, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq. (1953).
107. Coastal Zone Management Act, United States Code, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq. (1972).
108. National Marine Sanctuaries Act, United States Code, 16 U.S.C. § 1433 et seq. (1972);
109. H. Upton and E. Buck, Marine Protected Areas: An Overview, CRS Report RL32154, 2010, available online: .
110. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Act), United States Code, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1883 (1976).
111. National Ocean Council: Another Step Toward Ocean Stewardship, available online: ;
112. National Ocean Council: Regional Planning Bodies, available online: .
113. California Oceans Protection Act (COPA), California Public Resources Code, Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 35600- 35625, 35515 (2004);
114. National Ocean Council: Draft National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan, available online: .
115. Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan (Massachusetts OMP), available online: .
116. M. Burger, “Consistency conflicts and federalism choice: Marine spatial planning beyond the states' territorial seas,” Environmental Law Reporter 41 (2011): 10602-10606;
117. G. Fugate, “Rhode Island's Ocean Special Area Management Plan: Leading the way for the nation,” Roger Williams University Law Review 17 (2012): 295.
118. Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, available online: .
119. T. Agardy, Ocean Zoning: Making Marine Management More Effective (London: Earthscan, 2010);
120. D.A. Tarnas, “The U.S. National Marine Sanctuary Program: An analysis of the program's implementation and current issues,” Coastal Management 16 (1988): 275-303.
121. C. White, B.S. Halpern and C.V. Kappel, “Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20 (2012): 4696-4701.
122. B. Halpern, S. Walbridge, K. Selkoe, C. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. Agrosa, J.F. Bruno, K.S. Casey, C. Ebert, H.E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H.S. Lenihan, E.M.P. Madin, M.T. Perry, E.R. Selig, M. Spalding, R. Steneck and R. Watson, “A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems,” Science 319 (2008): 948-952.
123. B. Trouillet, T. Guineberteau, M. de Cacqueray and J. Rochette, “Planning the sea: The French experience. Contribution to marine spatial planning perspectives,” Marine Policy 35 (2011): 324-334.