Fourteen years of nime: The value and meaning of ‘community’ in interactive music research

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 307-311

  Marquez Borbon, Adnan ^a   Stapleton, Paul ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communities of interest; Communities of practice; NIME history; Performance; Situated learning

Indexed keywords

MUSIC;

COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE; COMMUNITY OF INTEREST; INTERACTIVE MUSIC; NIME HISTORY; PERFORMANCE; SITUATED LEARNING;

LAPTOP COMPUTERS;

EID: 85124735164     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. J. Albert. Improvisation as tool and intention: Organizational practices in laptop orchestras and their e↵ect on personal musical approaches. Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation, 8(1), May 2012.
2. I. M. Arievitch and J. P. P. Haenen. Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist, 40(3):155–165, 2005.
3. E. Berdahl and W. Ju. Satellite CCRMA: A musical interaction and sound synthesis platform. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pages 173–178, 2011.
4. S. Billett. Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6(3):263–280, Sept. 1996.
5. W. Bowman. The community in music. International Journal of Community Music, 2(2-3):109–128, 2009.
6. J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1):32–42, Jan. 1989.
7. J. S. Brown and P. Duguid. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1):40–57, Jan. 1991.
8. J. Butler. Creating pedagogical etudes for interactive instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conferences on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pages 77–80, 2008.
9. K. Cascone. The aesthetics of failure: “Post-digital” tendencies in contemporary computer music. Computer Music Journal, 24(4):12–18, 2000.
10. K. Cascone. Grain, sequence, system: Three levels of reception in the performance of laptop music. Contemporary Music Review, 22(4):101–104, 2003.
11. N. Collins. Live coding of consequence. Leonardo, 44(3):207–211, 2011.
12. N. Collins, A. McLean, J. Rohrhuber, and A. Ward. Live coding in laptop performance. Organised Sound, 8(03):321–330, 2003.
13. P. Cook. Re-designing principles for computer music controllers: A case study of squeezevox maggie. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University, pages 218–221, 2009.
14. A. Cox. What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6):527–540, Dec. 2005.
15. G. D’Arcangelo. Creating a context for musical innovation: A NIME curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2002 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 1–4. National University of Singapore, 2002.
16. S. Fels and M. Lyons. Creating new interfaces for musical expression: Introduction to NIME. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Courses, page 11. ACM, 2009.
17. R. Fiebrink, G. Wang, and P. R. Cook. Don’t forget the laptop: using native input capabilities for expressive musical control. In Proceeding Of The Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME), 2007.
18. G. Fischer. Learning in communities: A distributed intelligence perspective. In J. M. Carroll, editor, Learning in Communities: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Centered Information Technology, pages 11–16. Springer, 2009.
19. L. Gaye, L. E. Holmquist, F. Behrendt, and A. Tanaka. Mobile music technology: Report on an emerging community. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pages 22–25. IRCAM – Centre Pompidou, 2006.
20. R. Grossmann. The tip of the iceberg: Laptop music and the information-technological transformation of music. Organised Sound, 13:5–11, 3 2008.
21. M. Gurevich, P. Stapleton, and P. Bennett. Design for style in new musical interactions. In Proceeding Of The Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME), pages 213–217. New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME), 2009.
22. S. Heinz and S. O’Modhrain. Designing a shareable musical TUI. In Proceedings of the Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), 2010.
23. J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
24. H. Leeuw and J. Tamminga. NIME education at the HKU. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), 2012.
25. M. MacMillan. Autonomous learning within a learning community?: Musicians have been doing it for years! In Proceedings of the XXIXth Annual Conference: 2-4 July 2007. Music Education Research, Values and Initiatives, page 104. Australian Association for Research in Music Education, 2007.
26. T. Magnusson. Of epistemic tools: Musical instruments as cognitive extensions. Organised Sound, 14(02):168–176, 2009.
27. T. Magnusson. Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems. Computer Music Journal, 34(4):62–73, Nov. 2010.
28. T. Magnusson. Confessions of a live coder. In Proceedings of International Computer Music Conference. University of Huddersfield, 2011.
29. A. McPherson and Y. E Kim. The problem of the second performer: Building a community around an augmented piano. Computer Music Journal, 36(4):10–27, 2012.
30. A. Monroe. Ice on the circuits/coldness as crisis: The re-subordination of laptop sound. Contemporary Music Review, 22(4):35–43, 2003.
31. S. O’Modhrain. A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal, 35(1):28–42, 2011.
32. S. Oore. Learning advanced skills on new instruments. In Proceeding Of The Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME), 2005.
33. B. Ostertag. Human bodies, computer music. Leonardo Music Journal, pages 11–14, 2002.
34. J. Rambusch. Situated learning and Galperin’s notion of object-oriented activity. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, volume s. 1998-2003, pages 1998–2003, 2006.
35. J. Rambusch and T. Ziemke. The role of embodiment in situated learning. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 1803-1808. the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005.
36. J. Richards. Getting the hands dirty. Leonardo Music Journal, 18(1):25–31, 2008.
37. B. Rogo↵. Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. Sociocultural Studies of Mind, 1995.
38. W. A. Schloss. Using contemporary technology in live performance: The dilemma of the performer. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3):239–242, 2003.
39. K. K. Shelemay. Musical communities: Rethinking the collective in music. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64(2):pp. 349–390, 2011.
40. C. Stuart. The object of performance: Aural performativity in contemporary laptop music. Contemporary Music Review, 22(4):59–65, 2003.
41. D. Trueman. Why a laptop orchestra? Organised Sound, 12(02):171–179, 2007.
42. T. Turner. The resonance of the cubicle: Laptop performance in post-digital musics. Contemporary Music Review, 22(4):81–92, 2003.
43. O. Vallis and A. Kapur. Community-based design: The democratization of musical interface construction. Leonardo music journal, 21:29–34, 2011.
44. J. Waldron. Exploring a virtual music community of practice: Informal music learning on the internet. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 2(2-3):97–112, 2009.
45. J. L. Waldron and K. K. Veblen. The medium is the message: cyberspace, community, and music learning in the irish traditional music virtual community. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(2-3):99–111, 2008.
46. G. Wang and P. R. Cook. On-the-fly programming: using code as an expressive musical instrument. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 138–143. National University of Singapore, 2004.
47. G. Wang, D. Trueman, S. Smallwood, and P. R. Cook. The laptop orchestra as classroom. Computer Music Journal, 32(1):26–37, 2008.
48. A. Ward, J. Rohrhuber, F. Olofsson, A. McLean, D. Gri ths, N. Collins, and A. Alexander. Live algorithm programming and a temporary organisation for its promotion. In Proceedings of the README Software Art Conference, 2004.
49. E. Wenger. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
50. M. Zbyszyński. An elementary method for tablet. In Proceedings of the International Conferences on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), 2008.