Transforming organizations: Strategies and methods

Transforming Organizations: Strategies and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-149

  Kotnour, Timothy G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85122646581     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (58)

1. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., and Ahlstrand, B., Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, Free Press, New York, 2005.
2. Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, Review of Issues Associated with Safe Operation and Management of the Space Shuttle Program (Nov 1996), ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/reports/1996/asap_summary.txt (accessed November 16, 2008).
3. Boeing, Boeing Updates Assessment of Launch and Satellite Businesses in Weak Commercial Space Markets, 2003, http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2003/q3/nr_030715a.html (accessed November 16, 2008).
4. Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center Story, http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/about/history/story/kscstory.html (accessed November 16, 2008).
5. Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center Implementation Plan, 1997.
6. McCurdy, H.E., Faster, Better, Cheaper: Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 2003.
7. National Academy of Public Administration, "A Review of the Joint Base Operations and Support Contract Kennedy Space Center/45th Space Wing," 2002.
8. NASA, The Report of Space Shuttle Management Independent Review Team, 1995a.
9. NASA, NASA HQ RELEASE: 95-73, Headquarters, Washington, D.C., 1995b.
10. NASA, Review of Issues Associated with Safe Operation and Management of the Space Shuttle Program, Nov. 1996.
11. NASA, Concept of Privatization of the Space Shuttle Program, September 2001.
12. NASA and U.S. Air Force, Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group: Baseline Report, November 2003.
13. NASA and U.S. Air Force, Advanced Range Technology Working Group: Baseline Report, March 2004.
14. Office of Science and Technology Policy and National Security Council, "The Future Management and Use of the U.S. Space Launch Bases and Ranges, Report of the Interagency Working Group," February 8, 2000.
15. Right Associates, "Organization Measurement Consulting Services offered to NASA Kennedy Space Center," February 1996.
16. Space Launch Vehicles Broad Area Review Report Nov 1999, http://klabs.org/richcontent/Reports/Failure_Reports/Space:Launch_Vehicles_Broad_Area_Review.pdf (accessed November 16, 2008).
17. United States Congress, "Commercial Space Act of 1998 (PUBLIC LAW 105-303)-OCT. 28, 1998."
18. Hamel, G., Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2002.
19. Kurstedt, H. A., Management Systems Theory, Application, and Design, Author, Blacksburg, VA, 1993.
20. Applebaum, S.H., Simpson, R., and Shapiro, B.T., The tough test of downsizing, Organ. Dyn., v(i), 68-79, 1987.
21. Argyris, C., and Schon, D.A., Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1978.
22. Brynjolfsson, E., Renshaw, A.A., and Van Alstyne, M., The matrix of change, Sloan Manage. Rev., Winter, 37-54, 1997.
23. Cameron, K., Freeman, S.J., and Mishra, A.K., Downsizing and redesigning organizations, in Organizational Change and Redesign, Huber, G.P., and Glick, W.H., Eds., Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 19-65, 1993.
24. Davidson, W.H., Beyond re-engineering: the three phases of business transformation, IBM Syst J., 32(1), 1993.
25. Gadd, K.W., and Oakland, J.S., Chimera or culture? Business process reengineering for total quality management, Qual. Manage. J., 3(3), 20-38, 1996.
26. Grover, V., From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practices, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 46(1), 36-46, 1999.
27. Hatch, N., and Mowery, D.C., Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing, Manage. Sci., 44(11), 1461-1477, 1998.
28. Huber, G.P., Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures, Organ. Sci., 2(1), 88-115, 1991.
29. Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A., and Jick, T.D., The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1992.
30. Kotter, J.P., Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.
31. Lawler, E., Mohrman, S., and Ledford, G., Strategies for High-Performing Organization, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
32. Marshall, R., and Yorks, L., Planning for a restructured, revitalized organization, Sloan Manage. Rev., Summer, 81-91, 1994.
33. Mukherjee, A., Lapre, M., and Van Wassenhove, L., Knowledge driven quality improvement, Manage. Sci., 44(11), S35-S49, 1998.
34. NASA and U.S. Air Force, Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group: Baseline Report, November 2003.
35. NASA and U.S. Air Force, Advanced Range Technology Working Group: Baseline Report, March 2004.
36. National Academy of Public Administration, "A Review of the Joint Base Operations and Support Contract Kennedy Space Center/45th Space Wing," 2002.
37. National Academy of Public Administration, Effective Downsizing: A Compendium of Lessons Learned for Government Organizations, National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996.
38. Office of Science and Technology Policy and National Security Council, "The Future Management and Use of the U.S. Space Launch Bases and Ranges, Report of the Interagency Working Group," February 8, 2000.
39. Sink, D.S., and Morris, W.T., By What Method?, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA, 1995.
40. Kotter, J.P., Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.
41. Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A., and Jick, T.D., The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1992.
42. Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., and Smith, B., The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations, Doubleday Business, New York, NY, 1999.
43. Sink, D.S., and Morris, W.T., By What Method?, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA, 1995.
44. Lawler, E., Mohrman, S., and Ledford, G., Strategies for High Performance Organizations, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
45. NASA, NASA Strategic Plan, 1997.
46. Simons, R., How top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal, Strategic Manage. J., 15, 169-189, 1994.
47. Schwartz, P., The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World, Currency Doubleday, New York, 1996.
48. Hahn, D. Strategic management - tasks and challenges in the 1990s, Long Range Plann., 24(1), 26-39, 1991.
49. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D., Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.
50. Mintzberg, H., Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Free Press, New York, NY, 1994.
51. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1996, NASA Strategic Management Handbook, Author, Washington, D.C.
52. Pekar, P., and Abrham, S., Is strategic management living up to its promise?, Long Range Plann., 28(5), 32-44, 1995.
53. Royer, I., Why bad projects are so hard to kill, Harv. Bus. Rev., February 2003.
54. Sandy, W. Avoid the breakdowns between planning and implementation, J. Bus. Strategy, Sept./Oct., 30-33, 1991.
55. Sink, S.D., and Tuttle, T., Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA, 1989.
56. Taylor, B. Strategic planning - which style do you need?, Long Range Plann., 17(3), 51-62, 1984.
57. Waalewijn, P., and Segaar, P., Strategic management: the key to profitability in small companies, Long Range Plann., 26(2), 24-30, 1993.
58. Wilson, I., Strategic planning isn't dead - it changed, Long Range Plann., 27(4), 12-24, 1994.