Verta participation in the wmt14 metrics task

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 368-375

  Comelles, Elisabet ^a   Atserias, Jordi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTIC FEATURES; LINGUISTIC MOTIVATION;

EID: 85122641392     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. J. S. Albrecth and R. Hwa. 2007. A Re-examination of Machine Learning Approaches for Sentence-Level MT Evaluation. In The Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Prague, Czech Republic.
2. J. S. Albrecth and R. Hwa. 2007. Regression for Sentence-Level MT Evaluation with Pseudo References. In The Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Prague, Czech Republic.
3. J. Atserias, R. Blanco, J. M. Chenlo and C. Rodriquez. 2012. FBM-Yahoo at RepLab 2012, CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop) 2012, September 20, 2012.
4. C. Callison-Burch, M. Osborne and P. Koehn. 2006. Re-evaluating the role of BLEU in machine translation research. In Proceedings of the EACL 2006.
5. C. Callison-Burch, P. Kohen, Ch. Monz, M. Post, R. Soricut and L. Specia. 2012. Findings of the 2012 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Montréal. Canada.
6. A. X. Chang and Ch. D. Manning. 2012. SUTIME: A Library for Recognizing and Normalizing Time Expressions. 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012).
7. M. Ciaramita and Y. Altun. 2006. Broad-coverage sense disambiguation and information extraction with a supersense sequence tagger. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
8. E. Comelles, J. Atserias, V. Arranz and I. Castellón. 2012. VERTa: Linguistic features in MT evaluation. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12), Istanbul, Turkey.
9. M.C. de Marneffe, B. MacCartney and Ch. D. Manning. 2006. Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses in Proceedings of the 5th Edition of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2006). Genoa, Italy.
10. M. J. Denkowski and A. Lavie. 2011. METEOR 1.3: Automatic Metric for Reliable Optimization and Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (ACL-2011). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
11. J. Gimenez and Ll. Marquez. 2007. Linguistic features for automatic evaluation of heterogeneous MT systems in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (ACL), Prague, Czech Repubilc.
12. J. Gimenez and Ll. Marquez. 2008. A smorgasbord of features for automatic MT evaluation in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (ACL). Columbus. OH.
13. J. Gimenez. 2008. Empirical Machine Translation and its Evaluation. Doctoral Dissertation. UPC.
14. J. Gimenez and Ll. Márquez. 2010. Linguistic Measures for Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation. Machine Translation, 24(3?4),77?86. Springer.
15. B. Hachey, W. Radford and J. R. Curran. 2011. Graph-based named entity linking with Wikipedia in Proceedings of the 12th International conference on Web information system engineering, pages 213-226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
16. Y. He, J. Du, A. Way and J. van Genabith. 2010. The DCU Dependency-based Metric in WMT-Metrics MATR 2010. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics MATR (WMT 2010), Uppsala, Sweden.
17. A. Lavie and M. J. Denkowski. 2009. The METEOR Metric for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. Machine Translation, 23.
18. G. Leusch and H. Ney. 2008. BLEUSP, INVWER, CDER: Three improved MT evaluation measures. In NIST Metrics for Machine Translation 2008 Evaluation (MericsMATR08), Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 2008.
19. D. Liu and D. Hildea. 2005. Syntactic Features for Evaluation of Machine Translation in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, Ann Arbor
20. Ch.Lo and D. Wu. 2010. Semantic vs. Syntactic vs. Ngram Structure for Machine Translation Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Syntax Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation. Beijing. China.
21. Ch. Lo, A. K. Tumurulu and D. Wu. 2012. Fully Automatic Semantic MT Evaluation. Proceedings of the 7th Wrokshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Montreal, Canada, June 7-8.
22. K. Owczarzak, J. van Genabith and A. Way. 2007. Dependency-Based Automatic Evaluation for Machine Translation in Proceedings of SSST, NAACLHLT/ AMTA Workshop on Syntax and Structure I Statistical Translation, Rochester, New York.
23. K. Owczarzak, J. van Genabith and A. Way. 2007. Labelled Dependencies in Machine Translation Evaluation in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, Czech Republic.
24. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward and W. Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL02). Philadelphia. PA.
25. F. Reeder, K. Miller, J. Doyon and J. White. 2001. The Naming of Things and the Confusion of Tongues: An MT Metric. Proceedings of the Workshop on MT Evaluation "Who did what to whom?" at Machine Translation Summit VIII.
26. L. Specia and J. Gimenez. 2010. Combining Confidence Estimation and Reference-based Metrics for Segment-level MT Evaluation. The Ninth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA 2010), Denver, Colorado.
27. D. Wetzel and F. Bond. 2012. Enriching Parallel Corpora for Statistical Machine Translation with Semantic Negation Rephrasing. Proceedings of SSST-6, Sixth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, Jeju, Republic of Korea.