Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain

Advances in instructional Psychology: Volume 4

Volumn 4, Issue , 2019, Pages 55-175

  Schoenfeld, Alan H ^a   Smith, John P ^a   Arcavi, Abraham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121571296     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Anzai, Y., & Simon, H. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124-140.
2. Bell, A., & Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 34-42.
3. Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
4. Buck, R. C. (1970). Functions. In E. G. Begle (Ed.), Mathematics education: Sixty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 236-259). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Clement, J. (1982a). Algebra word problem solutions: Thought processes underlying a common misconception. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13,16-30.
6. Clement, J. (1982b). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-70.
7. Clement, J. (1987). Overcoming students' misconceptions in physics: The role of anchoring intuitions and analogical validity. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (pp. 102-119). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
8. Confrey, J. (1988, February). The concept of exponential functions: A student's perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, University of Georgia.
9. diSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15-33). Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. diSessa, A. A. (1986). Artificial worlds and real experience. Instructional Science, 14, 207-227.
11. diSessa, A. A. (in press). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction.
12. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1982, November). Intuitive functional concepts: A baseline study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13 (5), 360-380.
13. Dugdale, S. (1982). Green globs: A microcomputer application for graphing equations. Mathematics Teacher, 75, 208-214.
14. Dugdale, S. (1984). Computers: Applications unlimited. In V. P. Hansen (Ed.), Computers in mathematics education: 198k Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 82-89). Reston, VA: NCTM.
15. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
16. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
17. Goldenberg, E. P. (1988). Mathematics, metaphors, and human factors: Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representation of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7(2), 135-173.
18. Goldenberg, E. P., & Kliman, M. (1988). Metaphors for understanding graphs: What you see is what you see. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center.
19. Greeno, J. (1983). Conceptual entities. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 227-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Hansen, V. P. (Ed.). (1984). Computers in mathematics education: 1984 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
21. Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations: Meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In P. A. Carpenter & M. A. Just (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 89-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Ionesco, (1958). The lesson. In Four plays by Eugene Ionesco (pp. 43-78). New York: Grove Press.
23. ITMA Collaboration. (1984). The micro as a teaching assistant. Essex, UK: Longman House.
24. Janvier, C. (1983). Teaching the concept of function. Mathematical Education for Teaching, 4 (2), 48-60.
25. Janvier, C. (1987). Representation and understanding: The notion of function as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 67-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Kaput, J. (1985a, August). Multiplicative word problems and intensive quantities: An integrated software response (Tech. Rep. No. 85-19). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Educational Technology Center.
27. Kaput, J. (1985b). Representation and problem solving: Methodological issues related to modeling. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 381-398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Klahr, D. (1978). Goal formation, planning, and learning by pre-school problem solvers or: "My socks are in the dryer." In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 181-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60 (1), 1-64.
30. Magidson, S. (1989). Revolving lines: Naive theory building in a guided discovery setting. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley, School of Education.
31. Matz, M. (1982). Toward a process model for high school algebra. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25-50). London: Academic.
32. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24 (4), 369-383.
34. Moschkovich, J. (1989, April). Constructing a problem space through appropriation: A case study of tutoring during computer exploration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
35. Moschkovich, J. N. (1990) Students' interpretations of linear equations and their graphs. Proceedings of the Uth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (IGPME), 2, 109-116.
36. Nickerson, R., & Zodhiates, P. (Eds.). (1988). Technology in education: Looking toward 2020. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Novak, J. (Ed.).(1987). Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
38. Pea, R. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Rumelhart, D., & Norman, D. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511-588). New York: Wiley.
40. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Ideas in the air. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 71-78.
41. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1990). Grapher: A case study in educational technology, research, and development. In A. diSessa, M. Gardner, J. Greeno, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 281-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Siegler, R., & Klahr, D. (1982). When do children learn? The relationship between existing knowledge and the acquisition of new knowledge. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Siegler, R., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, Psychology Department, Pittsburgh, PA.
44. Sleeman, D. (1982). Assessing aspects of competence in basic algebra. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 185-200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Smith, D. A., Porter, G. J., Leinbach, L. C, & Wenger, R. H. (Eds.). (1988). Computers and mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
46. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
47. VanLehn, K. (1982). Bugs are not enough: Empirical studies of bugs, impasses, and repairs in procedural skills. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3 (2), 152-167.
48. VanLehn, K. (1983). On the representation of procedures in repair theory. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 197-252). New York: Academic.
49. VanLehn, K. (1991). Rule acquisition events in the discovery of problem solving strategies. Cognitive Science, 15 (1), 1-47.
50. VanLehn, K., & Brown, J. S. (1980). Planning nets: A representation for formalizing analogies and semantic models of procedural skills. In R. E. Snow, P. E. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 2. Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem solving (pp. 95-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. VanLehn, K., Brown, J. S., & Greeno, J. (1982). Competitive argumentation in computational theories of cognition (Xerox Cognitive and Instructional Science Series Report No. CIS-14). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox.
52. Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20 (4), 356-366.