Knowledge politics: Open sourcing education

Online Education: Global Questions, Local Answers

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 285-300

  Faber, Brenton ^a,b   Johnson Eilola, Johndan ^a,c  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Public Software Fund   (United States)

^c Eastman Kodak Center for Excellence in Communications   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121528816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781315223971-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. E. Wyatt, Investors Are Seeing Profits in Nation’s Demand for Education, New York Times, November 4, 1999, http://www.nytimes.eom/library/national/110499private-business-edu.html.
2. P. Drucker, Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1993.
3. P. Drucker, Management’s New Paradigms, Forbes, 5, pp. 152-177, October 1998.
4. R. Reich, The Work of Nations, Vintage, New York, 1991.
5. R. Reich, The Future of Success, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2001.
6. C. Reigeluth, What Is Instructional Design Theory and How is It Changing?Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory Volume II, C. Reigeluth (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 5-29, 1999.
7. J. Gee, G. Hull, and C. Lankshear, The New Work Order, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1996.
8. C. Wick, Knowledge Management and Leadership Opportunities for Technical Communicators, Technical communications, 47:4, pp. 515-529, 2000.
9. S. Slaughter and L. Leslie, Professors Going Pro: The Commercialization of Teaching, Research, and Service, in Campus Inc.: Corporate Power in the Ivory Tower, G. White (ed.), Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York, pp. 140-156, 2000.
10. N. Rivard, The Cost of Going the Distance, Matrix, pp. 25-28, September 2001.
11. J. F. Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, G. Bennington and B. Massumi (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1979.
12. G. Sauer, Community, Courseware, and Intellectual Property Law, in Online Communities: E-Commerce, Online Education, and Non-Profit Online Activities, C. Werry and M. Mowbray (eds.), Pearson, New York, pp. 215-238, 2001.
13. E. Foster, Is It OK For Microsoft and Others to Forbid Disclosure of Benchmark Results? InfoWorld, http://www.infoworld.eom/articles/op/xml/01/04/16/010416opfoster.xml.
14. E. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, O’Reilly, Sebastopol, California, 1999.
15. S. Ante, Big Blue’s Big Bet on Free Software; It’s Pouring Cash into an All Out Effort to Promote Linux, Business Week, 3761, p. 78, December 10, 2001.
16. J. Biggs, New Uses Help Introduce Linux Operating System to Non Geeks, New York Times, p. G.6, November 29, 2001.
17. L. Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York, 1999.
18. L. Lessig, The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, Random House, New York, 2001.
19. L. Gomes, Linux Campaign is an Uphill Battle for Microsoft Corp., Wall Street Journal, p. B.10, June 14, 2001.
20. L. Flynn, Despite Microsoft’s Best Efforts to Kill It, The Free Software Movement Shows No Sign of Quietly Rolling Over and Dying, New York Times, p. C.4, June 4, 2001.
21. G. Moody, Online: Free Software Survives Downturn: Bill Gates Beware: Open Source Is Flourishing Even if the Companies are Not, The Guardian, p. 1, January 10, 2002.
22. The Open Source Initiative, 2003, www.opensource.org.
23. Business: An Open and Shut Case, Economist, 359:8221, p. 67, May 12, 2001.
24. Peruvian Congressman Refutes Microsoft’s “Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt” (F.U.D.) Concerning Free and Open Source Software, The Open Source Initiative, May 24, 2002, http://www.opensource.org/docs/peru_and_ms.php.
25. S. Weber, The Political Economy of Open Source Software, The Berkeley Roundtable on International Economy, 2000, http://brie.berkeley.edu/~briewww/pubs/pubs/wp/wp140.pdf.
26. M. Markus, B. Manville, and C. Agres, What Makes a Virtual Organization Work? MIT Sloan Management Review, 42:1, pp. 13-26, 2000.
27. J. Feller and B. Fitzgerald, A Framework Analysis of the Open Source Software Development Paradigm, Proceedings of the 21 st International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 58-69, 2000.
28. J. Lerner and J. Tirole, The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions, European Economic Review, 45, pp. 819-826, 2001.
29. Y. Yamauchi, M. Yokazawa, T. Shinohara, and T. Ishida, Collaboration with Lean Media: How Open-Source Software Succeeds, Proceedings from ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, New York, pp. 329-338, 2000.
30. M. Gallivan, Striking a Balance between Trust and Control in a Virtual Organization: A Content Analysis of Open Source Software Case Studies, Information Systems Journal, 11:4, pp. 1-28, 2001.
31. M. Bergquist and J. Ljungberg, The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities, Information Systems Journal, 11:4, pp. 305-320, 2001.
32. S. Bodker, C. Nielsen, and M. G. Petersen, Creativity, Cooperation, and Interactive Design, ACM Conference Proceedings on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, ACM Press, New York, pp. 252-261, 2000.
33. E. Berglund and M. Priestley, Open Source Documentation: In Search of User-Driven, Just-in-Time Writing, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation: Communicating in the New Millennium, S. Tilley (ed.), ACM Press, New York, pp. 132-141, 2001.
34. F. Olsen, Jones Knowledge Will Give Away Its Course Management Software, Chronicle of Higher Education, August 30, 2002, http://chronicle.com/free/2002/08/2002083001t.htm.