Making a mesh of it: A STELLAR approach to teacher professional development

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 105-114

  Derry, Sharon J ^a   Hmelo Silver, Cindy E ^b   Nagarajan, Anandi ^b   Chernobilsky, Ellina ^b   Feltovich, Joan ^c   Halfpap, Brad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Rutgers University   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN AND MACHINE COGNITION   (United States)

Author keywords

Design based learning; Instructional design; Online learning; Problem based learning; Teacher education; Transfer; Video cases

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121412617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educatonal Computing Research, 30(1), 85-109.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Barrows, H. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern University Press.
4. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: The University Press.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
6. Bransford, J. D., Deny, S. J., & Berliner, D. C. (in press). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world.
7. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
8. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31, 163-217.
10. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Feltovich, J. (1996). Collaboration within and among minds: Mastering complexity, individually and in groups. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 25-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Fischer, G. (1994). Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity. Knowledge-Based Systems, 7(4), 221-232.
12. Fischer, G. (1998). Making learning a part of life-beyond the 'gift wrapping' approach of technology. In E. Kammler (Ed.), Lifelong learning and its impact on social and regional development (pp. 435-462). Bremen Germany: Donat Verlag.
13. Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond "couch potatoes": From consumers to designers and active contributors. First Monday, 7(12).
14. Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2004). Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development. In V. Wulf (Ed.), End User Development - Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology (pp. (in press)). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
16. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
17. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20,1-55.
18. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
19. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
20. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community, Teachers College Record (Vol. 103, pp. 942-1012).
21. Gutierrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 145-187.
22. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Collaborative ways of knowing issues in facilitation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of CSCL 2002.
23. Kolodner, J. L., & Guzdial, M. (2000). Theory and practice of case-based learning aids. In S. M. Land (Ed.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 215-242). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate perpheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lieberman, A. (1996). Creating intentional learning communities. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 51-55.
26. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
28. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.
29. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
30. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
31. Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice Based Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teahers of Mathematics, Inc.
32. Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., Thota, J. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (2003). Cognitive flexibility theory: Hypermedia for complex learning, adaptive knowledge application, and experience acceleration. Educational Technology, 43, 5-10.
33. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. D. D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-75).
34. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 498-531). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. P., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In S. M. Glynn (Ed.), Executive Control Processes in Reading (pp. 177-199). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
37. West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003). Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
39. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 183-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.