English-to-Czech factored machine translation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 232-239

  Bojar, Ondřej ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION;

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; MORPHOLOGICAL TAGGER; MULTIPLE FACTORS; PHRASE-BASED MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; TRANSLATION QUALITY;

MACHINE TRANSLATION;

EID: 85121330886     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Jeff A. Bilmes and Katrin Kirchhoff. 2003. Factored language models and generalized parallel backoff. In Proc. of NAACL 2003, pages 4-6.
2. Ondřej Bojar and Zdeněk Žabokrtský. 2006. CzEng: Czech-English Parallel Corpus, Release version 0.5. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 86:59-62.
3. Ondřej Bojar, Evgeny Matusov, and Hermann Ney. 2006. Czech-English Phrase-Based Machine Translation. In Proc. of FinTAL 2006, pages 214-224, Turku, Finland.
4. Peter F. Brown, Vincent J. Della Pietra, Peter V. deSouza, Jennifer C. Lai, and Robert L. Mercer. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):467-479.
5. Ciprian Chelba and Frederick Jelinek. 1998. Exploiting syntactic structure for language modeling. In Proc. of ACL 1998, pages 225-231, San Francisco, California.
6. David Chiang. 2005. A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In Proc. of ACL 2005, pages 263-270.
7. Martin Čmejrek, Jan Cuřín, Jiří Havelka, Jan Hajič, and Vladislav Kuboň. 2004. Prague Czech-English Dependecy Treebank: Syntactically Annotated Resources for Machine Translation. In Proc. of LREC 2004, Lisbon, Portugal.
8. Adrià de Gispert, José B. Mariño, and Josep M. Crego. 2005. Improving statistical machine translation by classifying and generalizing inflected verb forms. In Proc. of Eurospeech 2005, pages 3185-3188, Lisbon, Portugal.
9. Ilknur Durgar El-Kahlout and Kemal Oflazer. 2006. Initial Explorations in English to Turkish Statistical Machine Translation. In Proc. of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, ACL 2006, pages 7-14, New York City.
10. Jason Eisner. 2003. Learning non-isomorphic tree mappings for machine translation. In Proc. of ACL 2003, Companion Volume, pages 205-208, Sapporo, Japan.
11. Sharon Goldwater and David McClosky. 2005. Improving statistical MT through morphological analysis. In Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, pages 676-683.
12. Jan Hajič and Barbora Hladká. 1998. Tagging Inflective Languages: Prediction of Morphological Categories for a Rich, Structured Tagset. In Proc. of COLING/ACL 1998, pages 483-490, Montreal, Canada.
13. Jan Hajič. 2004. Disambiguation of Rich Inflection (Computational Morphology of Czech). Nakladatelství Karolinum, Prague.
14. Philipp Koehn and Kevin Knight. 2003. Empirical methods for compound splitting. In Proc. of EACL 2003, pages 187-193.
15. Philipp Koehn. 2004a. Pharaoh: A beam search decoder for phrase-based statistical machine translation models. In Proc. of AMTA 2004, pages 115-124.
16. Philipp Koehn. 2004b. Statistical Significance Tests for Machine Translation Evaluation. In Proc. of EMNLP 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
17. Philipp Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proc. of MT Summit X.
18. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207-223.
19. T.P. Nguyen and A. Shimazu. 2006. Improving Phrase-Based SMT with Morpho-Syntactic Analysis and Transformation. In Proc. of AMTA 2006, pages 138-147.
20. Sonja Nießen and Hermann Ney. 2001. Toward hierarchical models for statistical machine translation of inflected languages. In Proc. of Workshop on Data-driven methods in machine translation, ACL 2001, pages 1-8.
21. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-51.
22. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proc. of ACL 2003, Sapporo, Japan.
23. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proc. of ACL 2002, pages 311-318.
24. M. Popović and H. Ney. 2004. Improving Word Alignment Quality using Morpho-Syntactic Information. In Proc. of COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland.
25. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Part-Of-Speech Tagger. In Proc. of EMNLP 1996, Philadelphia, USA.
26. David Talbot and Miles Osborne. 2006. Modelling lexical redundancy for machine translation. In Proc. of COLING and ACL 2006, pages 969-976, Sydney, Australia.
27. Kenji Yamada and Kevin Knight. 2002. A decoder for syntax-based statistical MT. In Proc. of ACL 2002, pages 303-310.
28. Mei Yang and Katrin Kirchhoff. 2006. Phrase-based backoff models for machine translation of highly inflected languages. In Proc. of EACL 2006.
29. Andreas Zollmann, Ashish Venugopal, and Stephan Vogel. 2006. Bridging the inflection morphology gap for arabic statistical machine translation. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL.