Identifying cognates by phonetic and semantic similarity

2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Kondrak, Grzegorz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICE COEFFICIENT; KEYWORD SELECTION; LONGEST COMMON SUBSEQUENCES; MULTI-VALUED; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; WORDNET;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85120608216     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Chris Brew and David McKelvie. 1996. Word-pair extraction for lexicography. In K. Oflazer and H. Somers, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, pages 45-55, Ankara, Bilkent University.
2. Eric Brill. 1995. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21 (4):543-566.
3. Alexander Budanitsky. 1999. Lexical semantic relatedness and its application in natural language processing. Technical Report CSRG-390, University of Toronto. Available from ftp.cs.toronto.edu/csrg-technical-reports.
4. Kenneth W. Church. 1993. Char_align: A program for aligning parallel texts at the character level. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1-8, Columbus, Ohio.
5. Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet: an electronic lexical database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
6. Jacques B. M. Guy. 1994. An algorithm for identifying cognates in bilingual wordlists and its applicability to machine translation. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1 (1):35-42.
7. John Hewson. 1974. Comparative reconstruction on the computer. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics, pages 191-197.
8. John Hewson. 1993. A computer-generated dictionary of proto-Algonquian. Hull, Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization.
9. John Hewson. 1999. Vocabularies of Fox, Cree, Menomini, and Ojibwa. Computer file.
10. Grzegorz Kondrak. 2000. A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequences. In Proceedings of the First Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 288-295.
11. John B. Lowe and Martine Mazaudon. 1994. The reconstruction engine: a computer implementation of the comparative method. Computational Linguistics, 20:381-417.
12. Tony McEnery and Michael Oakes. 1996. Sentence and word alignment in the CRATER Project. In J. Thomas and M. Short, editors, Using Corpora for Language Research, pages 211-231. Longman.
13. I. Dan Melamed. 1999. Bitext maps and alignment via pattern recognition. Computational Linguistics, 25(1):107-130.
14. John Nerbonne and Wilbert Heeringa. 1997. Measuring dialect distance phonetically. In Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON-97). Available from http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/sigphon.
15. Jason Rennie. 1999. Wordnet::QueryData Perl module. Available from http://www.ai.mit.edu/~jrennie.
16. Don Ringe. 1998. A probabilistic evaluation of Indo-Uralic. In Joseph C. Salmons and Brian D. Joseph, editors, Nostratic: sifting the evidence, pages 153-197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Michel Simard, George F Foster, and Pierre Isabelle. 1992. Using cognates to align sentences in bilingual corpora. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, pages 67-81, Montreal, Canada.
18. R. L. Trask. 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.
19. Piek Vossen, editor. 1998. EuroWordNet: a Multilingual Database with Lexical Semantic Networks. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.