Cognitive grouping and recursion in prosody

Recursion and Human Language

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 343-369

  Hunyadi, László ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85120393397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Beckman, Mary E., and Janet Pierrehumbert 1986 Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255-310.
2. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
3. Clifton, Charles, Jr., Katy Carlson, and Lyn Frazier 2002 Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech 45 (2): 87-114.
4. Cooper, William and Jeanne Paccia-Cooper 1980 Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch 2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
6. Downing, Bruce T. 1970 Syntactic structure and phonological phrasing in English. Ph.D. diss., University of Texas Austin.
7. Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser, and Noam Chomsky 2005 The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179-210.
8. Hayes, Bruce 1984 The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 3-74.
9. Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1980 Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. London: Penguin.
10. Hunyadi, Laszlo 2002 Hungarian Sentence Prosody and Universal Grammar. Frankfurt/ New York: Peter Lang.
11. Hunyadi, Laszlo 2006 Grouping, the cognitive basis for recursion in language. Argumentum 2: 67-114. University of Debrecen.
12. Jackendoff, Ray and Steven Pinker 2005 The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97: 211-25.
13. Ladd, D. Robert 1986 Intonational Phrasing: The Case for Recursive Prosodic Structure. Phonology Yearbook 3: 311-340.
14. Ladd, D. Robert 1992 An introduction to intonational phonology. In: Gerard J. Doch-erty and D. Robert Ladd (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology. Vol. II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 321-334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ladd, D. Robert 1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Liberman, Mark and Alan Prince 1977 On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249-336.
17. Lickley, Robin, J. 1994 Detecting Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
18. Liu, Y. Annie and Scott D. Stoller 1999 From recursion to iteration: What are the optimizations? ACM Sigplan Notices 34: 73-82.
19. Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel 1982 Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In: Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Vol. I, 225-255. Dordrecht: Foris.
20. Parker, Anna R. 2006 Evolution as a Constraint on Theories of Syntax: The Case against Minimalism. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
21. Peperkamp, Sharon 1997 Prosodic words. HIL Dissertations 34. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
22. Pinker, Steven and Ray Jackendof 2005 The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 95: 201-236.
23. Pierrehumbert, Janet 1980 The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, published 1988 by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
24. Price, P.J., M. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, and C. Fong 1991 The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90: 2956-2970.
25. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1984 Phonology and Syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1995 The prosodic structure of function words. In: Jill Beckman, Laura Welsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk. (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 439-469. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
27. Taglicht, Joseph 1998 Constraints on intonational phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 34: 181-211.
28. Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1999 On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219-255.
29. Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2007 The syntax-phonology interface. In: Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 435-456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wagner, Michael 2005 Prosody and recursion. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
31. Watson, Duane and Edward Gibson 2004 The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2004, 19 (6): 713-755.