Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for natural language generation

Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2000 - co-located with 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, ANLP 2000 - Student Research Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 41-45

  Oates, Sarah Louise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE MARKERS; GENERATION SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85120165936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. J. Delin, D. R. Scott, and A. Hartley. 1996. Language Specific Mappings from Semantics to Syntax. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 292-297. COLING96.
2. B. Eraser. 1998. Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. In A. H. Jucker and Y. Ziv, editors, Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pages 301-326. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
3. B. Grote, N. Lenke, and M. Stede. 1995. Ma(r)king Concessions in English and German. In Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 11-32, Leiden, May. Leiden University.
4. A. Knott. 1995. A Data-Driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
5. G. Leech, R. Garside, and M. Bryant. 1994. CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 622-628, Kyoto, Japan.
6. W. Mann and S. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8:243-281.
7. K. K. Millis, J. M. Golding, and G. Barker. 1995. Causal Connectives Increase Inference Generation. Discourse Processes, 20(1):29-50.
8. J. D. Moore and M. E. Pollack. 1992. A Problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):537-544.
9. G Nelson. 1995. The International Corpus of English: Markup & Transcription. In G. N. Leech, G. Myers, and J. A. Thomas, editors, Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, mark-up and application, pages 220-223. Longman, London.
10. G. Nunberg. 1990. The Linguistics of Punctuation. CSLI Lecture Notes, no. 18. Center for the study of Language and information, Stanford.
11. R. Power, D. Scott, and C. Doran. 1999. Generating Embedded Discourse Markers from Rhetorical Structure. In Proceedings from the European Workshop on Natural Language Generation EWNLG'99, pages 30-38, Toulouse.
12. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, S. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London.
13. T. Sanders, W. Spooren, and L. Noordman. 1992. Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15:1-35.
14. D.R. Scott and CS. de Souza. 1990. Getting the Message Across in RST-based Text Generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, and M. Zock, editors, Current Research in Natural Language Generation, pages 47-73. Academic Press, London.
15. B. L. Webber and A. K. Joshi. 1998. Anchoring a Lexicalised Tree-Adjoining Grammar for Discourse. In M. Stede, L. Warner, and E. Hovy, editors, Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Proceedings from the Workshop. COLING-ACL'98, pages 86-92, Montreal.