A pipeline framework for dependency parsing

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference Poster Sessions

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 65-72

  Chang, Ming Wei ^a   Do, Quang ^a   Roth, Dan ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

BOTTOM UP; COMPUTATIONAL STRATEGY; DEPENDENCY PARSING; ERROR ACCUMULATION; PIPELINE MODELS; SENTENCE LEVEL;

PIPELINES;

EID: 85119681061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. A. V. Aho, R. Sethi, and J. D. Ullman. 1986. Compilers: Principles, techniques, and tools. In Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
2. A. Carlson, C. Cumby, J. Rosen, and D. Roth. 1999. The SNoW learning architecture. Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-99-2101, UIUC Computer Science Department, May.
3. J. Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proc. the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 340-345, Copenhagen, August.
4. A. Haghighi, A. Ng, and C. Manning. 2005. Robust textual inference via graph matching. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 387-394, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. T. Marciniak and M. Strube. 2005. Beyond the pipeline: Discrete optimization in NLP. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 136-143, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. M. P. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330, June.
7. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 91-98, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
8. J. Nivre and M. Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of english text. In COLING2004, pages 64-70.
9. Joakim Nivre. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In IWPT, Nancy, France.
10. V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The necessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role labeling. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
11. A. Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A linear observed time statistical parser based on maximum entropy models. In EMNLP-97, The Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1-10.
12. D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Annual Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. D. Roth. 1998. Learning to resolve natural language ambiguities: A unified approach. In Proc. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 806-813.
14. K. Toutanova, D. Klein, and C. Manning.”2003”. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 03.
15. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In IWPT2003.
16. H. Yamada. 2006. Private communication.