Grafts follow from merge

Phases of Interpretation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 17-44

  van Riemsdijk, Henk ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85119165058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Abbott, Barbara 2003 Some notes on quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 13-26.
2. Beermann, Dorothee, David LeBlanc and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 1997 Rightward Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Bianchi, Valentina 1999 Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 1995 In terms of merge: copy and head movement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27: 41-64.
5. Bresnan, Joan and Jane Grimshaw 1978 The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331-391.
6. Caponigro, Ivano 2004 The semantic contribution of wh-words and type shifts: Evidence from free relatives crosslinguistically. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, Robert B. Young (ed.), 38-55. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications Cornell University.
7. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam 2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam 2004 The Generative Enterprise Revisited. Discussions with Riny Huijbregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Chomsky, Noam 2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1-22.
11. Emonds, Joseph E. 1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York: Academic Press.
12. Emonds, Joseph E. 1985 A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
13. Epstein, Samuel D., Eric M. Groat, Ruriko Kawashima and Hisatsugu Kitahara 1998 A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gärtner, Hans-Martin 2002 Generalized Transformations and Beyond: Reflections on Minimalism. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
15. Geurts, Bart, and Maier, Emar 2003 Quotation in context. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 109-128.
16. Groos, Anneke and Henk C. van Riemsdijk 1981 Matching effects in free relatives: a parameter of core grammar. In Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference, Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), 171-216. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
17. Grosu, Alexander 2003 A unified theory of 'standard' and 'transparent' free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247-331.
18. Guimarães, Maximiliano 2004 Derivation and representation of syntactic amalgams. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland.
19. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky and W. Tecumseh Fitch 2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
20. Kajita, Masaru 1977 Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44-66.
21. Kayne, Richard 1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Lakoff, George 1974 Syntactic amalgams. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox and Anthony Bruck (eds.), 321-344. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
23. McCawley, James D. 1982 Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry13: 91-106.
24. McCawley, James D. 1988 The Major Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
25. Moltmann, Friederike 1992 Coordination and comparatives. Ms., dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
26. Nakau, Minoru 1971 The grammar of the pseudo-free relative pronoun what. English Linguistics 6: 2-47.
27. Potts, Christopher to appear The dimensions of quotation. In Proceedings Workshop on Direct Compositionality, Chris Barker and Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Recanati, François 2001 Open quotation. Mind 110 (439): 637-687.
29. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 1998a Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 633-678.
30. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 1998b Trees and scions - science and trees. In Fest-Web-Page for Noam Chomsky, 32pp. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 2000 Free relatives inside out. Transparent free relatives as grafts. In PASE Papers in Language Studies. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English, Bozena Rozwadowska (ed.), 223-233.
32. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 2001a A far from simple matter. Syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, István Kenesei and Robert M. Harnish (eds.), 21-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 2001b WH-prefixes: the case of wäisch in Swiss German. In Naturally! Linguistic Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler Presented on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Chris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison and Friedrich Neubarth (eds.), 423-431. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
34. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 2004 Graft is the logically missing case of merge. Visnyk of the Kiev National Linguistic University 7: 5-13.
35. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van 2006 Free relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 2, Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), 338-382. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36. to appear Towards a unified theory of wh- and non-wh-amalgams. In Festschrift for NN.
37. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1974 French relative clauses. Ph.D. diss., MIT.
38. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1985 Dépendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. von Fintel, Kai Uwe 2004 How multi-dimensional is quotation? Ms. Cambridge, MA.
40. Vries, Mark de 2004 Parataxis as a different type of asymmetric merge. In Proceedings of IPSI-2004. Pescara Conference on Interfaces, hosted by the International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems, and Interdisciplinary Research. Pescara: CD-ROM (ISBN 86-7466-117-3).
41. Vries, Mark de 2005 Merge: properties and boundary conditions. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 22: 219-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Wilder, Chris
42. Vries, Mark de 1998 Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 10: 191-199.
43. Vries, Mark de 1999 Transparent free relatives. In Proceedings of WCCFL 77, Kimary N. Shahin, Susan Blake and Eun-Sok Kim (eds.), 685-699. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Stanford: CSLI).
44. Williams, Edwin 1982 Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 160-163.
45. Zhang, Ning (Niina) 2004 Move is remerge. Language and Linguistics 5: 189-209.