Corpus and evaluation measures for multiple document summarization with multiple sources

COLING 2004 - Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Hirao, Tsutomu ^a   Fukusima, Takahiro ^b   Okumura, Manabu ^c   Nobata, Chikashi ^d   Nanba, Hidetsugu ^e  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories

^b OTEMON GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^d Communication Research Laboratories ^*

^e HIROSHIMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CONSTRUCTION MEASURES; CORPUS CONSTRUCTION; DOCUMENT SETS; DOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION; EVALUATION MEASURES; LARGE SCALE TESTS; MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS; MULTIPLE SOURCE; TEST COLLECTION; TEXT SUMMARISATION;

REDUNDANCY;

EID: 85119093141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. 1998. The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries. In Proc. of the 21th ACM-SIGIR, pages 335-336.
2. T. Fukusima and M. Okumura. 2001. Text Summarization Challenge: Text Summarization Evaluation in Japan. In Proc. of the NAACL 2001 Workshop on Automatic summarization, pages 51-59.
3. T. Hirao, Y. Sasaki, and H. Isozaki. 2001. An Extrinsic Evaluation for Question-Biased Text Summarization on QA tasks. In Proc. of the NAACL 2001 Workshop on Automatic Summarization, pages 61-68.
4. T. Hirao, J. Suzuki, H. Isozaki, and E. Maeda. 2003. Multiple Document Summarization using Sequential Pattern Mining (in Japanese). In The Special Interest Group Notes of IPSJ (NL-158-6), pages 31-38.
5. H. Jing and K. McKeown. 1999. The Decomposition of Human-Written Summary Sentences. Proc. of the 22nd ACM-SIGIR, pages 129-136.
6. J. Kupiec, J Petersen, and F. Chen. 1995. A Trainable Document Summarizer. In Proc. of the 18th SIGIR, pages 68-73.
7. C-Y. Lin and E. H. Hovy. 2000. The Automated Acquisition of Topic Signatures for Text Summarization. In Proc. of the 16th COLING, pages 495-501.
8. I. Mani, G. Klein, D. House, L. Hirschman, T. Fir-man, and B. Sundheim. 2002. SUMMAC: a text summarization evaluation. Natural Language Engineering, 8(1):43-68.
9. D. Marcu. 1999. The Automatic Construction of Large-scale Corpora for Summarization Research. Proc. of the 22nd ACM-SIGIR, pages 137-144.
10. K. McKeown, R. Barzilay, D. Evans, V. Hatzivassilogou, M. Y. Kan, B. Schiffman, and S. Teufel. 2001. Columbia Multi-Document Summarization: Approach and Evaluation. In Proc. of the Document Understanding Conference 2001.
11. A. H. Morris, G. M. Kasper, and D.A. Adams. 1992. The Effects and Limitations of Automatic Text Condensing on Reading Comprehension. Information System Research, 3(1):17-35.
12. T. Nomoto and M. Matsumoto. 2001. A New Approach to Unsupervised Text Summarization. In Proc. of the 24th ACM-SIGIR, pages 26-34.
13. M. Okumura, T. Fukusima, and H. Nanba. 2003. Text Summarization Challenge 2, Text Summarization Evaluation at NTCIR Workshop 3. In Proc. of the HLT/NAACL 2003 Text Summarization Workshop, pages 49-56.
14. C. Paice. 1990. Constructing Literature Abstracts by Computer: Techniques and Prospects. Information Processing and Management, 26(1):171-186.
15. D. R. Radev, S. Teufel, H. Saggion, W. Lam, J. Blitzer, H. Qi, A. Celebi, D. Liu, and E. Drabek. 2003. Evaluation challenges in large-scale document summarization. In Proc. of the 41st ACL, pages 375-382.
16. S. Teufel and M. Moens. 1997. Sentence Extraction as a Classification Task. In Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pages 58-65.
17. K. Zechner. 1996. Fast Generation of Abstracts from General Domain Text Corpora by Extracting Relevant Sentences. In Proc. of the 16th COLING, pages 986-989.