Epistemology of science in curriculum standards of four Arab countries

The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in the Arab States

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 41-60

  Dagher, Zoubeida R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118800969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese students' views of nature of science. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8, 61-79.
3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
4. Alters, B. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
5. Bou Jaoude, S., Sowwan, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). The effect of using drama in science teaching on students' conceptions of nature of science. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 259-267). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Brewer, J., Augustine, H., & Zellman, L. (2007). Education for a new era: design and implementation of K-12 education reform in Qatar. Qatar: Rand Corporation.
7. Cohen, E., & Dagher, Z. (2005, July). An exploratory study of the nature of science in middle school science textbooks. Paper presented at the International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Group Meeting at the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
8. Cossman, G. (1989). A comparison of the image of science found in two future oriented guidelines documents for science education. In Proceedings of the first international history and philosophy of science and science teaching conference (pp. 83-104). Florida: University of Tallahassee.
9. Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (2005). Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378-391.
10. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
11. Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academies.
12. Dye, J., Schatz, I., Rosenberg, B., & Coleman, S. (2000, January). Constant comparison method: a kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report [On-line serial], 4(1/2). Retrieved from http:// www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-4/dye.html.
13. Foreign & Common Wealth Office. Middle East and North Africa. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/country-profiles/middle-east-north-africa/.
14. Haidar, A. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers' views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 807-822.
15. Haidar, A. (2002). Emirates secondary school science teachers' perspectives on the nexus between modern science and Arab culture. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 611-626.
16. Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
17. Matthews, M. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 161-174.
18. McComas, W., & Olson, J. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies.
20. Niaz, M., & Fenandez, R. (2008). Understanding quantum numbers in general chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 869-901.
21. Niaz, M. (2009). Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers' understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies. Science & Education, 18, 43-65.
22. Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the 'expert' community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
23. Rodriguez, M., & Niaz, M. (2002). How in spite of the rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooks. Science and Education, 11, 423-441.
24. Rudolph, J. (2000). Reconsidering the 'Nature of science' as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 403-419.
25. Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
26. Schubert, W. (2009). Curriculum inquiry. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 399-419). Los Angeles: Sage.
27. Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What scientists say: scientists views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 727-771.
28. Supreme Education Council. (2004). Qatar science standards: introduction. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.english.education.gov.qa/section/sec/ education_institute/cso/science:standards.
29. UNESCO Qatar info. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.unesco.org/iau/onlinedatabases/systems_data/qa.rtf.
30. UNESCO Lebanon info. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.unesco.org/iau/onlinedatabases/systems_data/lb.rtf.
31. UNESCO Egypt info. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.unesco.org/iau/onlinedatabases/systems_data/eg.rtf.
32. UNESCO Jordan info. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.unesco.org/iau/onlinedatabases/systems_data/jo.rtf.
33. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry:" How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481-512.