Limitations of current grammar induction algorithms

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2007-June, Issue , 2007, Pages 43-48

  Cramer, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; GRAMMAR INDUCTION; INDUCTION ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85118726912     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Pieter W. Adriaans and Mark R. Vervoort. 2002. The EMILE 4.1 grammar induction toolbox. In Proceedings of the 6th International Colloquium on Grammar Induction (ICGI), pages 293–295, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2. Pieter W. Adriaans. 1992. Language learning from a categorial perspective. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, NL.
3. Chris Biemann. 2006. Unsupervised part-of-speech tagging employing efficient graph clustering. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING-2006 Students Research Workshop, pages 7–12, Sydney, Australia.
4. Rens Bod. 2006. An all-subtrees approach to unsupervised parsing. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING-2006, pages 865–872, Sydney, Australia.
5. Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord, and Robert Malouf. 2000. Alpino: wide-coverage computational analysis of Dutch. In Proceedings of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN), pages 45–59, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
6. E. Mark Gold. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 16:447–474.
7. Zellig S. Harris. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Peter J. Henrichsen. 2002. GraSp: Grammar learning from unlabelled speech corpora. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002, pages 22–28, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
9. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2002. A generative Constituent-Context Model for improved grammar induction. In Proceedings of ACL-2001, pages 128–135, Toulouse, France.
10. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2005. Natural language grammar induction with a generative constituent-context model. Pattern Recognition, 9(38):1407–1419.
11. Shalom Lappin and Stuart M. Shieber. 2007. Machine learning theory and practice as a source of insight into universal grammar. Computational Linguistics, 43:1–34.
12. Andrei Mikheev. 1997. Automatic rule induction for unknown-word guessing. Computational Linguistics, 23(3):405–423.
13. Andrew Roberts and Eric Atwell. 2003. The use of corpora for automatic evaluation of grammar inference systems. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 conference, pages 657–661, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
14. Zach Solan, David Horn, Eytan Ruppin, and Shimon Edelman. 2005. Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(33):11629–11634.
15. Leonoor van der Beek, Gosse Bouma, Robert Malouf, and Gertjan van Noord. 2002. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Proceedings of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN) 2001, pages 8–22, Enschede, the Netherlands.
16. Menno van Zaanen and Pieter W. Adriaans. 2001. Alignment-Based Learning versus EMILE: A comparison. In Proceedings of the 13th Dutch-Belgian Artificial Intelligence Conference (BNAIC), pages 315–322, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
17. Menno van Zaanen. 2002. Implementing Alignment-Based Learning. In Proceedings of the 6th International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference (ICGI), pages 312–314, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.