Object individuation in infancy

Progress in infancy Research: Volume 3

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 193-244

  Wilcox, Teresa ^a   Schweinle, Amy ^b,c   Chapa, Catherine ^d  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^d Palo Alto College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118391475     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410607010-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). 8.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 69, 636-653.
2. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (in press). Developments in young infants’ reasoning about occlusion events. Cognitive Psychology.
3. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial characteristics of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 179-200.
4. Baillargeon, R. (1991). Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in 4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 38, 13-42.
5. Baillargeon, R. (1995). Amodel of physical reasoning in infancy. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 305-371). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Baillargeon, R. (1998). Infants’ understanding of the physical world. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in psychological science: Vol. 1. Cognitive and biological aspects (pp. 503-529). London: Psychology Press.
7. Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in 3.5- and 4.5-month-old infants: Further evidence. Child Development, 62, 1227-1246.
8. Baillargeon, R., & Graber, M. (1987). Where’s the rabbit? 5.5-month-old infants’ representation of the height of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 375-392.
9. Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 79-116). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
10. Banks, M. S., & Salapatek, P. (1981). Infant pattern vision: Anew approach based on the contrast sensitivity function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45.
11. Banks, M. S., & Salapatek, P. (1983). Infant visual perception. In M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 435-571). New York: Wiley.
12. Banks, M. S., & Shannon, E. (1993). Spatial and chromatic visual efficiency in human neonates. In C. E. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy (pp. 1-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Boller, K. (1997). Preexposure effects on infant learning and memory. Developmental Psychobiology, 31, 93-105.
14. Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., & Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 115-129.
15. Brown, A. M. (1990). Development of visual sensitivity to light and color vision in human infants: A critical review. Vision Research, 30, 1159-1188.
16. Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138.
17. Catherwood, D., Crassini, B., & Freiberg, K. (1989). Infant response to stimuli of similar hue and dissimilar shape: Tracing the origins of the categorization of objects by hue. Child Development, 60, 752-762.
18. Chapa, C., & Wilcox, T. (1999, April). Object experience and individuation: Infants’use of color information. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
19. Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Craton, L., Poirier, C., & Heagney, C. (1998, April). Perceptual completion and object segregation in infancy. Presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta, GA.
21. Dannemiller, J. (1989). Atest of color constancy in 9- and 20-week-old human infants following simulated illuminant changes. Developmental Psychology, 25, 171-184.
22. Dannemiller, J., & Hanko, S. (1987). Atest of color constancy in 4-month-old human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 255-267.
23. Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Elsevier.
24. De Yoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219-226.
25. Fantz, R. L. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204, 66-72.
26. Granrud, C. E. (1987). Size constancy in newborn human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 28(Suppl.), 5.
27. Granrud, C. E., Haake, R. J., & Yonas, A. (1985). Infants’ sensitivity to familiar size: The effect of memory on spatial perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 459-456.
28. Greco, C., Hayne, H., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1990). Roles of function, reminding, and variability in categorization by 3-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 617-633.
29. Hayne, H., Rovee-Collier, C., & Perris, E. E. (1987). Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-old infants. Child Development, 58, 750-767.
30. Hespos, S. (2000, July). Tracking individual objects across occlusion and containment events in 6.5-month-old infants. Presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Brighton, England.
31. Hespos, S., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy. Psychological Science, 12, 141-147.
32. Johnson, S., & Aslin, R. (2000). Infants’ perception of transparency. Developmental Psychology, 36, 808-816.
33. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
34. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object- specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
35. Kaldy, Z., & Leslie, A. M. (2001). Identification of objects in 9-month-olds infants: Integrating what and where information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36. Kellman, P. J. (1984). Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 353-358.
37. Kellman, P. J., & Short, K. R. (1987). Development of three-dimensional form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 545-557.
38. Kolstad, V., & Baillargeon, R. (1993). Appearance- and knowledge-based responses to containers in infants. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Kotovsky, L., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants. Cognition, 67, 311-351.
40. Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, Toby, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfeld& S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Leslie, A. M., & Glanville, M. (2001, April). Is individuation by feature in young infants limited by attention or by working memory? Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
42. Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P., & Scholl, B. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10-18.
43. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988, May). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
44. Luo, Y. (2001, April). Infants’ knowledge of transparency in occlusion and containment events. Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
45. Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587-604.
46. Meltzoff, A., & Moore, K. (1998). Object representation, identity, and the paradox of early permanence: Steps toward a new framework. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 201-235.
47. Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures. In G. Thines, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published in 1964)
48. Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997). Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 217-227.
49. Namy, L. L., Smith, L. B., & Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (1997). Young children’s discovery of spatial classification. Cognitive Development, 12, 163-185.
50. Needham, A. (1999a). Infants’ perception of a paintbrush: Object segregation based on featural rules or category knowledge. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
51. Needham, A. (1999b). The role of shape in 4-month-old infants’ segregation of adjacent objects. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 161-178.
52. Needham, A. (2001). Object recognition and object segregation on 4.5-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 3-24.
53. Needham, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Effects of prior experience in 4.5-month-old infants’ object segregation. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 1-24.
54. Needham, A., & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Infants’ use of featural and experiential information in segregating and individuating objects: A reply to Xu, Carey, and Welch (2000). Cognition, 74, 255-284.
55. Needham, A., Baillargeon, R., & Kaufman, L. (1997). Object segregation in infancy. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 11, pp. 1-44). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56. Needham, A., Dueker, G., & Lockhead, G. (2001). Category information facilitates 4.5-month-old infants’ object segregation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
57. Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review, 81, 267-285.
58. Oakes, L. (2001, April). The role of comparison in category formation in infancy. Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
59. Pick, A. (1997). Perceptual learning, categorizing, and cognitive development. In C. Dent-Read& P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems (pp. 335-370). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60. Pieraut-Le Bonniec, G. (1985). From visual-motor anticipation to conceptualization: Reaction to solid and hollow objects and knowledge of the function of containment. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 413-424.
61. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: Asketch of the FINST spatial index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
62. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention. Cognition, 50, 363-384.
63. Quinn, P. C. (1987). The categorical representation of visual pattern information by young infants. Cognition, 27, 145-179.
64. Rovee-Collier, C. (1995). The development of infant memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 80-85.
65. Rovee-Collier, C. (1997). Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review, 104, 467-498.
66. Salapatek, P. (1975). Pattern perception in early infancy. In L. B. Cohen & P. Salapatek (Eds.), Infant perception: From sensation to cognition (pp. 133-248). New York: Academic.
67. Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Explaining the object concept: Beyond the perception/ cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore& Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26-73). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
68. Slater, A., Mattock, A., & Brown, E. (1990). Size constancy at birth: Newborn infants’ responses to retinal and real size. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 314-322.
69. Slater, A., & Morison, V. (1985). Shape constancy and slant perception at birth. Perception, 14, 337-344.
70. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.
71. Spelke, E. S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. J., & Wein, D. (1995). Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 113-143.
72. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition (pp. 44-78). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
73. Squire, L. R., Cohen, N. J., & Nadel, L. (1984). The medial temporal region and memory consolidation: A new hypothesis. In H. Weingartner & E. S Parker (Eds.), Memory consolidation: Psychobiology of cognition (pp. 185-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Teller, D. Y., & Bornstein, M. H. (1987). Infant color vision and color perception. In P. Salapatek& L. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of infant perception: Vol. 1. From Sensation to Perception (pp. 185-236). Orlando, FL: Academic.
75. Triesman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 21-237.
76. Treisman, A. (1995). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
77. Tremoulet, P. D., Leslie, A. M., & Hall, G. D. (2001). Infant individuation and identification of objects. Cognitive Development, 15, 499-522.
78. Ungerleider, L., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J.W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Walker-Andrews, A. (1994). Taxonomy for intermodal relations. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 39-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Wilcox, T. (1999a, April). Infants’ event representations: Extracting the simple structure. Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
81. Wilcox, T. (1999b). Object individuation: Infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color. Cognition, 72, 125-166.
82. Wilcox, T., & Baillargeon, R. (1998a). Object individuation in infancy: The use of featural information in reasoning about occlusion events. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 97-155.
83. Wilcox, T., & Baillargeon, R. (1998b). Object individuation in young infants: Further evidence with an event monitoring task. Developmental Science, 1, 127-142.
84. Wilcox, T., & Chapa, C. (2001). Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
85. Wilcox, T., & Chapa, C. (in press). Infants’ reasoning about opaque and transparent occluders in an individuation task. Cognition.
86. Wilcox, T., & Schweinle, A. (2002a). Infants’ use of speed information to individuate objects in occlusion events. Manuscript submitted for publication.
87. Wilcox, T., & Schweinle, A. (2002b). Object individuation and event mapping: Infants’ use of featural information. Developmental Science, 5, 87-105.
88. Wilcox, T., Tuggy, L., & Napoli, R. (2001, April). Young infants’ use of auditory information to individuate objects. Presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
89. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.
90. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (2000). The emergence of kind concepts: Arejoinder to Needham & Baillargeon (2000). Cognition, 74, 285-301.
91. Xu, F., Carey, S., & Welch, J. (1999). Infants’ ability to use object kind information for object individuation. Cognition, 70, 137-166.
92. Yonas, A., Arterberry, M. E., & Granrud, C. E. (1987). Four-month-old infants’ sensitivity to binocular and kinetic information for three-dimensional-object shape. Child Development, 58, 910-917.