What test oracle should i use for effective GUI testing?

Proceedings - 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 164-173

  Memon, Atif ^a   Banerjee, Ishan ^b   Nagarajan, Adithya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical studies; GUI testing; Oracle information; Oracle procedure; Test oracles

Indexed keywords

COSTS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; TESTING;

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; GUI TESTING; ORACLE INFORMATION; ORACLE PROCEDURE; OVERALL COSTS; OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS; SOFTWARE TESTINGS; TEST CASE; TEST EFFECTIVENESS; TEST ORACLES;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 85117393710     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2003.1240304     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. L. Baresi and M. Young. Test oracles. Technical Report CIS-TR-01-02, University of Oregon, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Eugene, Oregon, U.S.A., August 2001. http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/michal/pubs/oracles.html.
2. L. K. Dillon and Y. S. Ramakrishna. Generating oracles from your favorite temporal logic specifications. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, volume 21 of ACM Software Engineering Notes, pages 106-117, New York, Oct.16-18 1996. ACM Press.
3. L. K. Dillon and Q. Yu. Oracles for checking temporal properties of concurrent systems. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT'94 Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 140-153, Dec. 1994.
4. L. du Bousquet, F. Ouabdesselam, J.-L. Richier, and N. Zuanon. Lutess: a specification-driven testing environment for synchronous software. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 267-276. ACM Press, May 1999.
5. M. J. Harrold, A. J. Offut, and K. Tewary. An approach to fault modelling and fault seeding using the program dependence graph. Journal of Systems and Software, 36(3):273-296, Mar. 1997.
6. L. J. Jagadeesan, A. Porter, C. Puchol, J. C. Ramming, and L. G. Votta. Specification-based testing of reactive software: Tools and experiments. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'97), pages 525-537, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, May 1997. Springer.
7. L. R. Kepple. The black art of GUI testing. Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools, 19(2):40, Feb. 1994.
8. A. M. Memon. A Comprehensive Framework for Testing Graphical User Interfaces. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, July 2001.
9. A. M. Memon, M. E. Pollack, and M. L. Soffa. Automated test oracles for GUIs. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 8th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-8), pages 30-39, NY, Nov. 8-10 2000.
10. A. M. Memon, M. L. Soffa, and M. E. Pollack. Coverage criteria for GUI testing. In Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and 9th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9), pages 256-267, Sept. 2001.
11. A. J. Offutt and J. H. Hayes. A semantic model of program faults. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 195-200, 1996.
12. D. Peters and D. L. Parnas. Generating a test oracle from program documentation. In T. Ostrand, editor, Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), pages 58-65, 1994.
13. D. J. Richardson. TAOS: Testing with analysis and oracle support. In T. Ostrand, editor, Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA): August 17-19, 1994, Seattle, Washington, USA, ACM Sigsoft, pages 138-153, New York, NY 10036, USA, 1994. ACM Press.
14. D. J. Richardson, S. Leif-Aha, and T. O. OMalley. Specification-based Test Oracles for Reactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 105-118, May 1992.
15. E. Siepman and A. R. Newton. TOBAC: Test Case Browser for Object-Oriented Software. In Proc. International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 154-168, New York, Aug. 1994. ACM Press.
16. J. Su and P. R. Ritter. Experience in testing the Motif interface. IEEE Software, 8(2):26-33, Mar. 1991.
17. P. Vogel. An integrated general purpose automated test environment. In T. Ostrand and E. Weyuker, editors, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 61-69, New York, NY, USA, June 1993. ACM Press.
18. H. Zhu, P. Hall, and J. May. Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 29(4):366-427, Dec. 1997.