INTERFERENCE BETWEEN SURFACE FORM AND ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION IN SPOKEN WORD PERCEPTION

6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 1667-1670

  Chereau C ^a   Halle P A ^a   Segui, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH COMMUNICATION; WORD PROCESSING;

ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION; INTERACTIVE MODELS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPOKEN WORDS; SURFACE FORMS; WORD PERCEPTION;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 85116966748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K. & Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: phonological effects in written word comprehension. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A(4), 917-955.
2. Dijkstra, T., Fieuws, S. & Roelofs, A. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
3. Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K. & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual access: Towed primes frog. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 461-466.
4. Seidenberg, M. S. & Tanenhaus, M. K.(1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
5. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845-860.