Speech tactons improve speech warnings for drivers

AutomotiveUI 2014 - 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, in Cooperation with ACM SIGCHI - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Politis, Ioannis ^a   Brewster, Stephen ^a   Pollick, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alerting effectiveness; Annoyance; Audio; Multimodal interaction; Recognition accuracy; Speech; Tactile; Tactons; Urgency; Warnings

Indexed keywords

SPEECH; USER INTERFACES;

ALERTING EFFECTIVENESS; ANNOYANCE; AUDIO; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; RECOGNITION ACCURACY; TACTILE; TACTONS; URGENCY; WARNINGS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 85116180790     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2667317.2667318     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Baldwin, C.L. and Lewis, B.A. Perceived urgency mapping across modalities within a driving context. Applied Ergonomics, (2013), 1-8.
2. Baldwin, C.L. and Moore, C. Perceived Urgency, Alerting Effectiveness and Annoyance of Verbal Collision Avoidance System Messages. HFES Annual Meeting 46, 22 (2002), 1848-1852.
3. Baldwin, C.L. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance. Ergonomics 54, 4 (2011), 328-337.
4. Brown, L.M., Brewster, S.A., and Purchase, H.C. A First Investigation into the Effectiveness of Tactons. Eurohaptics, IEEE (2005), 167-176.
5. Brown, L.M., Brewster, S.A., and Purchase, H.C. Multidimensional tactons for non-visual information presentation in mobile devices. MobileHCI '06, ACM Press (2006), 231-238.
6. Cao, Y., Mahr, A., Castronovo, S., Theune, M., Stahl, C., and Müller, C.A. Local danger warnings for drivers: The effect of modality and level of assistance on driver reaction. Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM Press (2010), 239-248.
7. Cao, Y., Theune, M., and Müller, C. Multimodal Presentation of Local Danger Warnings for Drivers : A Situation-dependent Assessment of Usability. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), IEEE (2010), 226-229.
8. Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., Walters, K., Clift-Mathews, W., and Crowther, M. Acoustic, semantic and phonetic influences in spoken warning signal words. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17, 8 (2003), 915-933.
9. Hellier, E., Edworthy, J., Weedon, B., Walters, K., and Adams, A. The Perceived Urgency of Speech Warnings: Semantics versus Acoustics. Human Factors 44, 1 (2002), 1-17.
10. Ho, C., Reed, N., and Spence, C. Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance. Human Factors 49, 6 (2007), 1107-1114.
11. Ho, C. and Spence, C. Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied 11, 3 (2005), 157-74.
12. Hoggan, E.E. and Brewster, S.A. Crossmodal icons for information display. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 857-862.
13. Lee, J.D., Bricker, D.L., and Hoffman, J.D. A Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Scheduling In-Vehicle Messages. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 9, 2 (2008), 226-234.
14. Lewis, B.A., Penaranda, B.N., Roberts, D.M., and Baldwin, C.L. Effectiveness of Bimodal Versus Unimodal Alerts for Distracted Drivers. Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, (2013), 376-382.
15. Li, K.A. Enabling eyes-free interaction with tactile messages based on human experience. PhD Dissertation. 2009, 107-116.
16. McKeown, D., Isherwood, S., and Conway, G. Auditory Displays as Occasion Setters. Human Factors 52, 1 (2010), 54-62.
17. McKeown, D. and Isherwood, S. Mapping Candidate Within-Vehicle Auditory Displays to Their Referents. Human Factors 49, 3 (2007), 417-428.
18. Politis, I., Brewster, S.A., and Pollick, F. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 4067-4076.
19. Politis, I., Brewster, S.A., and Pollick, F. Evaluating Multimodal Driver Displays of Varying Urgency. Automotive UI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 92-99.
20. Pratt, S.M., Lewis, B.A., Penaranda, B.N., Roberts, D.M., Gonzalez, C., and Baldwin, C.L. Perceived Urgency Scaling in Tactile Alerts. HFES Annual Meeting 56, 1 (2012), 1303-1306.
21. SAE. Its In-Vehicle Message Priority Standard. J2395, (2002), 1-7.
22. Salminen, K., Surakka, V., Lylykangas, J., et al. Tactile Modulation of Emotional Speech Samples. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2012, (2012), 1-13.
23. Serrano, J., Di Stasi, L.L., Megías, A., and Catena, A. Effect of directional speech warnings on road hazard detection. Traffic injury prevention 12, 6 (2011), 630-635.
24. Spens, K.E., Huss, C., Dahlgvist, M., and Agelfors, E. A hand held two-channel vibro-tactile speech communication aid for the deaf : characteristics and results. Scandinavian Audiology 47, (1997), 7-13.
25. Tuuri, K., Eerola, T., and Pirhonen, A. Leaping across modalities: Speed regulation messages in audio and tactile domains. Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, Springer (2010), 10-19.