Science and Technology Controversy: A Rationale for Inquiry

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 26-29

  Goodnight, G Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85111699895     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821636     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Brante, Thomas. “Reasons for Studying Scientific and Science-Based Controversies.” Controversial Science: From Content to Contention. Ed. Thomas, Brante, Steve, Fuller and William, Lynch. Albany: State U of New York P, 1993. 177–92.
2. Collins, Randall. “Ethical Controversies of Science and Society: A Relation Between Two Spheres of Social Conflict.” Controversial Science: From Content to Contention. Ed. Thomas, Brante, Steve, Fuller and William, Lynch. Albany: State U of New York P, 1993. 301–18.
3. Gier, Ronald. “Controversies Involving Science and Technology: A Theoretical Perspective.” Scientific Controversies. Ed. H., Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. and Arthur L., Caplan. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987. 125–50.
4. Goodnight, G. Thomas. “Complex Cases and Legitimation Inferences: Extending the Toulmin Model to Deliberative Argument in Controversy.” The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18–21 May 2005. Ed. David, Hitchcock. Hamilton, Ont.: McMaster University, 2005. 156–166.
5. Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol 2. Lifeworld and System, A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Trans. Thomas, McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1989.
6. Markle, Gerald E., and James C., Petersen. “Controversies in Science and Technology-A Protocol for Comparative Research.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 6.34 (1981): 25–30. JSTOR. 31 Oct. 2004 (http://www.jstor.org/search).