Toward a Normative Conception of Difference in Public Deliberation

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 115-129

  Asen, Robert ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85111624292     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951626     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armstrong, S. A., (1995). Arlen Spector and the construction of adversarial discourse: Selective representations in the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32,75–89.
2. Aronowitz, S., (1993). Is a democracy possible? The decline of the public in the American debate. In B., Robbins (Ed.), The phantom public sphere (pp. 75–92). Minneapolis'. University of Minnesota Press.
3. Baudrillard, J., (1983). Simulations (P. Foss, P. Patton, & P. Beitchman, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).
4. Benhabib, S., (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.
5. Benhabib, S., (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S., Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Bohman, J., (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
7. Boyte, H. C., (1995). Public opinion as public judgment. In T. L., Glasser & C. T., Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 417–436). New York: Guilford.
8. Calhoun, C., (1993). Civil society and the public sphere. Public Culture, 5, 267–80.
9. Campbell, K. K., (1973). The rhetoric of women's liberation: An oxymoron. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 74–86.
10. Chesebro, J. W., (December 1996). Unity in diversity: Multiculturalism, guilt/victimage, and a new scholarly orientation. Spectra, 32, 10–14.
11. Cohen, J., (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J., Bohman & W., Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–91).
12. Cambridge, MA,: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
13. Dawson, M. C., (1994). A black counterpublic? Economic earthquakes, racial agenda(s), and black politics. Public Culture, 7, 195–223.
14. Dewey, J., (1954). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow. (Original work published 1927)
15. Eagleton, T., (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.
16. Edelman, M., (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Felski, R., (1989). Beyond feminist aesthetics: Feminist literature and social change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L., (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62,2–18.
19. Foucault, M., (1980). Two lectures. In C., Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). New York. Pantheon.
20. Fraser, N., (1989). What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. In Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory (pp. 113–143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Fraser, N., (1992a). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C., Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
22. Fraser, N., (1992b). Sex, lies, and the public sphere: Some reflections on the confirmation of Clarence Thomas. Critical Inquiry, 18, 595–612.
23. Goodnight, G. T., (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 75, 214–227.
24. Gregory, S., (1994). Race, identity, and political activism: The shifting contours of the African American public sphere. Public Culture, 7, 147–164.
25. Griffin, C. L., (1996). The essentialist roots of the public sphere: A feminist critique. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 21–39.
26. Gutman, A., & Thompson, D., (1996). Democracy and disagreement: Why moral conflict cannot be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
27. Habermas,J., (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Original work published 1992)
28. Habermas, J., (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C., Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 421–461). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
29. Habermas, J., (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 1 (3), 49–55.
30. Habermas, J., (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Original work published 1962)
31. Landes, J., (1988). Women and the public sphere in the age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32. Lyotard, J-F., (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
33. Maguire, M., & Mohtar, L. F., (1994). Performance and the celebration of a subaltern counterpublic. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 238–252.
34. Mansbridge, J., (1996). Using power/fighting power: The polity. In S., Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political 46–66). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. McCarthy, T., (1992). Practical discourse: On the relation of morality to politics. In C., Calhoun (Ed), Habermas and the public sphere. 51–72). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
36. Page, B., (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Reddy, W. M., (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere: Implications for an historical ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 135–168.
38. Rodger, J., (1985). On the degeneration of the public sphere. Political Studies, 33, 203–217.
39. Ryan, M. P., (1990). Women in public: Between banners and ballots. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Schudson, M., (1995). The power of the news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Schudson, M., & King, E., (1995). The illusion of Reagan's popularity. In The power of the news (pp. 124–141). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Taylor, C., (1995). The politics of recognition. In Philosophical arguments (pp. 225–256). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Thelen, D., (1996). Becoming citizens in the age of television: How Americans challenged the media and seized political initiative during the Iran-Contra Debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Villa, D. R., (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere. American Political Science Review, 86, 712–721.
45. Walzer, M., (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
46. Warner, M., (1993). The mass public and the mass subject. In B., Robbins (Ed.), The phantom public sphere (pp. 234–56). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Williams, R., (1985). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (Revised ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Young, I. M., (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S., Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Zarefsky, D., (1996). The roots of American community. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.