Qualitative Researchers’ Conceptualizations of the Risks Inherent in Qualitative Interviews

Qualitative Inquiry and the Politics of Evidence

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 195-218

  Morse, Janice M ^a   Niehaus, Linda ^b   Varnhagen, Stanley ^b   Austin, Wendy ^b   Mc Intosh, Michele ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85106098705     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2001. Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research. Academe 87(3):55-67.
2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2006a. Oral history exempt from Federal oversight. Academe Online. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JF/NB/0ralHist.htm (accessed November 28, 2007).
3. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2006b. Research and human subjects: Academic freedom and the institutional review boards (2006). http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/humansubs.htm (accessed October 3, 2007).
4. Carome, M. A. 2005. Clarification of OHRP’s position on oral history information (e-mail). http://www.UTexas.edu/research/RSC/humanresearch/specialtopics/documents/michaelcaromeUpdated.pdf (accessed November 22, 2005).
5. Cassell, J. 1980. Ethical principles for conducting fieldwork. American Anthropologist 82(1):28-41.
6. Davis, D. S. 1991. Rich cases: Ethics of thick description. Hastings Center Report 21(4):12-17.
7. Denzin, N. K. n.d. IRBs and the turn to indigenous research ethics. Unpublished paper, College of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
8. Ellis, C. 1995. Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(1):68-98.
9. Gunsalus, C. K., E. M. Bruner, N. C. Burbles, L. Dash, M. Finkin, J. P. Goldberg, W. T. Greenough, G. A. Miller, M. G. Pratt, M. Iriye, & D. Aronson. 2007. The Illinois white paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRM “mission creep.” Qualitative Inquiry 13(5):617-49.
10. Johnson, M. 2007. Criticizing research from an ethical point of view. In T. Long & M. Johnson (Eds.), Research ethics in the real world: Issues and solutions for health and social care, pp. 85-102. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston.
11. Lincoln, Y. S. 2005. Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism: The challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In N. K. Denzon & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed., pp. 165-82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Lincoln, Y. S. & W. Tierney. 2004. Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2):219-34.
13. Long, T. 2007. How are these ethical issues to be resolved? In T. Long & M. Johnson (Eds.), Research ethics in the real world: Issues and solutions for health and social care, pp. 85-102. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston.
14. Morse, J. M. 2002. Emotional re-enactment (Editorial). Qualitative Health Research 12(2):147.
15. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (DHEW Pub. No. (OS) 78-0008). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
16. Richie, D. A., & L. Shopes. 2007. Oral history excluded from IRB approval. http://alpha.dickinson.edu/oha/org_irb.html (accessed May 18, 2007).
17. Tri-Council Policy Statement, 1998. Ethical conduct for research involving humans should be cited thus: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conductfor research involving humans (with 2000, 2002 and 2005 amendments). www.pre.ethics.gc.ca (accessed November 28, 2007).
18. van den Hoonaard, W. C. 2002. Walking the tightrope. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
19. Weinberg, M. 2002. Biting the hand that feeds you, and other feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In W. Van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope, pp. 79-94. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.