Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies

Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 63-82

  Gardner, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85106085415     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315428819-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (138)

1. Antonio, R. J. 2000. Karl Marx. In G. Ritzer (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists, 105-43. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Arnold, B. 2001. The limits of agency in the analysis of elite Iron Age Celtic burials. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(2): 210-24.
4. Baert, P. 1998. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Bamforth, D. B. 2002. Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity 67(3): 435-52.
6. Bamforth, D. B. 2003. What is archaeology? (Or, confusion, sound, and fury, signifying…). American Antiquity 68(3): 581-84.
7. Bapty, I., and T. Yates (eds.). 1990. Archaeology after Structuralism. London: Routledge.
8. Barnes, B. 2000. Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.
9. Barrett, J. C. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Barrett, J. C. 2000. A thesis on agency. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 61-68. London: Routledge.
11. Barrett, J. C. 2001. Agency, the duality of structure, and the problem of the archaeological record. In I. Hodder (ed.), Archaeological Theory Today, 141-64. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Bell, J. 1992. On capturing agency in theories about prehistory. In J.-C. Gardin and C. S. Peebles (eds.), Representations in Archaeology, 30-55. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Berggren, K. 2000. The knowledgeable agent? On the paradoxes of power (with a comment by B. Chan and T. Georgousopoulou). In C. Holtorf and H. Karlsson (eds.), Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, 39-51. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.
14. Bintliff, J. 2004. Time, structure, and agency: The annales, emergent complexity, and archaeology. In J. Bintliff (ed.), A Companion to Archaeology, 174-94. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (translated by R. Nice).
16. Brück, J. 2001. Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 649-67.
17. Bryant, C. G. A., and D. Jary (eds.). 2001. The Contemporary Giddens: Social Theory in a Globalizing Age. Houndmills: Palgrave.
18. Chapman, J. 2000. Tension at funerals: Social practices and the subversion of community structure in later Hungarian prehistory. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 169-95. London: Routledge.
19. Chippindale, C. 1993. Ambition, deference, discrepancy, consumption: The intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. In N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (eds.), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, 27-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Clark, J. E. 2000. Towards a better explanation of hereditary inequality: A critical assessment of natural and historic human agents. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 92-112. London: Routledge.
21. Cloak, F. T. 1975. Is cultural ethology possible? Human Ecology 3: 161-82.
22. Cohen, I. J. 1989. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. Houndmills: Macmillan.
23. Cornell, P., and F. Fahlander. 2002. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology 10: 21-38.
24. Creighton, J. 2006. Britannia: The Creation of a Roman Province. London: Routledge.
25. Dewey, J. 1999 [1984]. Individualism Old and New. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
26. Dobres, M.-A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Dobres, M.-A., and J. E. Robb. 2000. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 3-17. London: Routledge.
28. Dobres, M.-A., and J. E. Robb. 2005. ‘Doing’ agency: Introductory remarks on methodology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3): 159-66.
29. Dornan, J. J. 2002. Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9(4): 303-29.
30. Elliott, A. 2001. Concepts of the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962-1023.
32. Engelstad, E. 1991. Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity 65(248): 502-14.
33. Fewster, K. 2007. The role of agency and material culture in remembering and forgetting: An ethnoarchaeological case study from central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 20(1): 89-114.
34. Flannery, K. 1999. Process and agency in early state formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9(1): 3-21.
35. Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.
36. Fowler, C. 2000. The individual, the subject, and archaeological interpretation: Reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler (with a comment by S. Tarlow). In C. Holtorf and H. Karlsson (eds.), Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, 107-33. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.
37. Fowler, C. 2002. Body parts: Personhood and materiality in the earlier Manx Neolithic. In Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik and S. Tarlow (eds.), Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality, 47-69. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
38. Fowler, C. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.
39. Gardner, A. 2004a. Agency and community in 4th century Britain: Developing the structurationist project. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, 33-49. London: UCL Press.
40. Gardner, A. 2004b. Review of ‘Archaeology and Modernity’ (J. Thomas, 2004). Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 15: 118-21.
41. Gardner, A. 2007. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
42. Gardner, A. 2008. Agency. In R. A. Bentley, H. D. G. Maschner and C. Chippindale (eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Theories, 95-108. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
43. Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Gero, J. M. 2000. Troubled travels in agency and feminism. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 34-39. London: Routledge.
45. Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Houndmills: Macmillan.
46. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
47. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Giddens, A., and C. Pierson. 1998. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49. Gilchrist, R. 1994. Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women. London: Routledge.
50. Given, M. 2004. The Archaeology of the Colonized. London: Routledge.
51. Gosden, C. 2004. Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3): 193-211.
53. Gosden, C., and C. Knowles. 2001. Collecting Colonialism: Material Culture and Colonial Change. Oxford: Berg.
54. Graves-Brown, P. 1996. In search of the watchmaker: Attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. In H. D. G. Maschner (ed.), Darwinian Archaeologies, 165-81. New York: Plenum Press.
55. Handley, F. J. L., and T. Schadla-Hall. 2004. Identifying and defining agency in a political context. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power and Being Human, 135-50. London: UCL Press.
56. Harding, A. 2008. A conversation with Colin Renfrew (Professor Lord Renfrew of Kaimsthorn). European Journal of Archaeology 11(2-3): 143-70.
57. Hegmon, M. 2003. Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 68(2): 213-43.
58. Hill, J. N., and J. Gunn (eds.). 1977. The Individual in Prehistory: Studies of Variability in Style in Prehistoric Technologies. New York: Academic Press.
59. Hodder, I. (ed.). 1982a. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Hodder, I. (ed.). 1982b. Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In I. Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Hodder, I. 1982c. Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Hodder, I. 1985. Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, 1-26. New York: Academic Press.
63. Hodder, I. 1991. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and individuals in long-term processes. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 21-33. London: Routledge.
65. Hodder, I., and S. Hutson. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Jenkins, R. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
67. Jenkins, R. 2004. Social Identity. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
68. Joas, H. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
69. Joas, H. 1997. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press (translated by R. Meyer).
70. Johnson, M. H. 1989. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189-211.
71. Johnson, M. H. 2000. Self-made men and the staging of agency. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 213-31. London: Routledge.
72. Johnson, M. H. 2004. Agency, structure and archaeological practice. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power and Being Human, 241-47. London: UCL Press.
73. Johnson, M. H. 2006. On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory (with comments). Archaeological Dialogues 13(2): 117-82.
74. Jorge, V. O., and J. Thomas (eds.). 2007. Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture, special issue, Journal of Iberian Archaeology, vol. 9/10. Porto: ADECAP.
75. Joyce, A. A. 2000. The founding of Monte Albán: Sacred propositions and social practices. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 71-91. London: Routledge.
76. Joyce, R. A. 2004. Unintended consequences? Monumentality as a novel experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(1): 5-29.
77. Kantner, J. 2003. Biological evolutionary theory and individual decision-making. In T. L. VanPool and C. S. VanPool (eds.), Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, 67-87. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
78. Knapp, A. B., and P. van Dommelen. 2008. Past practices: Rethinking individuals and agents in archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(1): 15-34.
79. Knappett, C. 2002. Photographs, skeuomorphs and marionettes: Some thoughts on mind, agency and object. Journal of Material Culture 7(1): 97-117.
80. Knappett, C. 2005. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
81. Kristiansen, K. 2004. Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology (with comments). Archaeological Dialogues 11(2): 77-132.
82. Lake, M. 2004. Being in a simulacrum: Electronic agency. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, 191-209. London: UCL Press.
83. Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (translated by Catherine Porter).
84. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Law, J., and J. Hassard (eds.). 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
86. Leone, M. 1984. Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: The William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds.), Ideology, Power and Prehistory, 25-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. MacGregor, G. 1994. Post-processual archaeology: The hidden agenda of the secret agent. In I. M. Mackenzie (ed.), Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture?, 79-91. Worldwide Archaeology Series 11. Aldershot: Avebury.
88. Macmurray, J. 1957. The Self as Agent. Vol. 1 of The Form of the Personal. London: Faber and Faber.
89. Martin, L. H., H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton (eds.). 1988. Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
90. McCall, J. C. 1999. Structure, agency, and the locus of the social: Why poststructural theory is good for archaeology. In J. E. Robb (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, 16-20. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
91. McCarthy, E. D. 1984. Toward a sociology of the physical world: George Herbert Mead on physical objects. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 5: 105-21.
92. McGuire, R. H. 2002. A Marxist Archaeology. Clinton Corners: Percheron Press.
93. Meskell, L. 1999. Archaeologies of Social Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
94. Meskell, L. 2004. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Berg.
95. Miller, D., and C. Tilley. 1984. Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. In D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds.), Ideology, Power and Prehistory, 1-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Mizoguchi, K. 2002. An Archaeological History of Japan, 30, 000 BC to AD 700. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
97. Morphy, H. 2009. Art as a mode of action: Some problems with Gell’s Art and Agency. Journal of Material Culture 14(1): 5-27.
98. Morris, B. 1991. Western Conceptions of the Individual. Oxford: Berg.
99. Morris, J. 2004. ‘Agency’ theory applied: A study of later prehistoric lithic assemblages from northwest Pakistan. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, 51-63. London: UCL Press.
100. Musolf, G. R. 2003. Structure and Agency in Everyday Life: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
101. Normark, J. 2004. Caught Somewhere in Time: Polyagentive Archaeology in the Maya Lowlands. GOTARC Series C, no. 52. Göteborg: Department of Archaeology, Göteborg University.
102. O’Brien, M. J., R. L. Lyman and R. D. Leonard. 2003. What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity 68(3): 573-80.
103. Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: Re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2): 87-104.
104. Ortner, S. B. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126-66.
105. Parker, J. 2000. Structuration. Buckingham: Open University Press.
106. Pauketat, T. R. 2000. The tragedy of the commoners. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 113-29. London: Routledge.
107. Renfrew, C. 1994. Towards a cognitive archaeology. In C. Renfrew and E. B. W. Zubrow (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, 3-12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Roberts, B. 2006. Micro Social Theory. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
109. Russell, I. 2007. Objects and agency: Some obstacles and opportunities of modernity. In V. O. Jorge and J. Thomas (eds.), Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture, special issue, Journal of Iberian Archaeology, vol. 9/10:71-87. Porto: ADECAP.
110. Shackel, P. A. 2000. Craft to wage labor: Agency and resistance in American historical archaeology. In M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, 232-46. London: Routledge.
111. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
112. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1989. Archaeology into the 1990s (with comments). Norwegian Archaeological Review 22(1): 1-54.
113. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1992. Re-Constructing Archaeology. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
114. Shennan, S. 2002. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames and Hudson.
115. Shennan, S. 2004. An evolutionary perspective on agency in archaeology. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, 19-31. London: UCL Press.
116. Sillar, B. 2004. Acts of god and active material culture: Agency and commitment in the Andes. In A. Gardner (ed.), Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, 153-89. London: UCL Press.
117. Sillar, B., and M. S. Tite. 2000. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 42(1): 2-20.
118. Sommer, U. 2001. ‘Hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother’: Change and persistence in the European Early Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(2): 244-70.
119. Sørensen, M. L. S. 2000. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
120. Spriggs, M. 2008. Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology 40(4): 538-52.
121. Stein, G. J. (ed.). 2005. The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press/Oxford: James Currey.
122. Stones, R. 2005. Structuration Theory. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
123. Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.
124. Strauss, C. 2007. Blaming for Columbine: Conceptions of agency in the contemporary United States. Current Anthropology 48(6): 807-32.
125. Taylor, T. 2008. Materiality. In R. A. Bentley, H. D. G. Maschner and C. Chippindale (eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Theories, 297-320. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
126. Taylor, W. W. 1983 [1948]. A Study of Archeology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
127. Thomas, J. 2000. Reconfiguring the social, reconfiguring the material. In M. B. Schiffer (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, 143-55. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
128. Thomas, J. 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
129. Thomas, J. 2007. The trouble with material culture. In V. O. Jorge and J. Thomas (eds.), Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture, special issue, Journal of Iberian Archaeology, vol. 9/10:11-23. Porto: ADECAP.
130. Tilley, C. 1989. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In V. Pinsky and A. Wylie (eds.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, 104-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Tilley, C. 2004. Mind and body in landscape research. In L. Russell, B. David, P. Hiscock and C. Tilley, ‘Viewpoint: Can archaeology recover past intentions?', 77-80. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14(1): 63-80.
132. Todorov, T. 2001. Life in Common: An Essay in General Anthropology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press (translated by K. Golsan and L. Golsan).
133. Trigger, B. G. 1998. Archaeology and epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian chasm. American Journal of Archaeology 102(1): 1-34.
134. Trigger, B. G. 2006. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Van Dyke, R. M. 2008. Temporal scale and qualitative social transformation at Chaco Canyon. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(1): 70-78.
136. VanPool, T. L., and C. VanPool. 2003. Agency and evolution: The role of intended and unintended consequences of action. In T. L. VanPool and C. S. VanPool (eds.), Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, 89-113. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
137. Webmoor, T., and C. L. Witmore. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41(1): 53-70.
138. Weigert, A. J. 2008. Pragmatic thinking about self, society, and natural environment: Mead, Carson and beyond. Symbolic Interaction 31(3): 235-58.