Formative assessment; Using peer and self-assessment in interpreter training

Benjamins Translation Library

Volumn 70, Issue , 2007, Pages 253-262

  Fowler, Yvonne ^a  

^a Social and Criminal Justice   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85106065635     PISSN: 09297316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/btl.70.28fow     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Bostock, S. 2000. Student Peer Assessment. www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cs/Stephen-Bostock/docs/bostock-peer-assessment.htm.
2. Brown, S, Rust, C., Gibbs, G. 1995. Involving students in the assessment process. In Strategies for Diversifying Assessment in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, and at DeLiberations. http:/www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/ocsd-pubs/div-ass5.html.
3. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. 1996. Meanings and Consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative assessment? British Education Research Journal, 22 (5) 537-548.
4. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Beta Kappan 80 (2).
5. Bruner, J. 1966. Toward a Theory of Instruction. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachussetts.
6. Niska, H. 1998. Testing community interpreters: A theory, a model and a plea for research. (cited 200X-xx-xx). http://tisa.toIk.su.se/OOTEST.HTM.
7. Ramaprasad, A. 1983. On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science 28, 4-13.
8. Sadler, D R.1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 145-165.