Statistical tests for the analysis of learner corpus data

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 287-309

  Gries, Stefan Th ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105724776     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.59.17gri     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altenberg, B. 1982. The Genitive vs. the Of-construction: A Study of Syntactic Variation in 17th Century English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.
2. Baayen, R.H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
4. Bock, J.K. 1982. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89(1): 1-47.
5. Brugmann, K. 1909. Das Wesen der lautlichen Dissimilationen. Abhandlungen der philologischhistorischen Klasse der königlich-sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 27, 147-178. Leipzig: Teubner.
6. Cooper, W.E. & Ross, J.R. 1975. World order. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, R.E. Grossman, L.J. San & T.J. Vance (eds), 63-111. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
7. Crawley, M. 2008. The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley.
8. Gries, St.Th. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.
9. Gries, St.Th. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Second edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Gries, St.Th. & Wulff, S. 2013. The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners: towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 327-356.
11. Hayes, B. 2008. Introductory Phonology. Malden MA: Blackwell.
12. Joseph, B.D. 2008. Last scene of all .... Language 84(4): 686-690.
13. Johnson, K. 2008. Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Leech, G.N., Francis, B. & Xu, X. 1994. The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories. In Continuity in Linguistic Semantics, C. Fuchs & B. Victorri (eds), 57-76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Plank, F. 1985. The interpretation and development of form alternations conditioned across word boundaries: The case of wife's, wives, and wives. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, R. Eaton, O. Fischer, W.F. Koopman & F. van der Leek (eds), 205-233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. [Accessed 22.2.2013]
17. Rosenbach, A. 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Selkirk, E.O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
19. Sheskin, D.J. 2011. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
20. Stefanowitsch, A. 2003. Constructional semantics as a limit to grammatical alternation. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 413-443. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.