Three perspectives on grammaticalization Lexico-grammar, corpora and historical sociolinguistics

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 13, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-31

  Nevalainen, Terttu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105526998     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.13.03nev     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Aarts, B. 2004. “Modelling linguistic gradience”. Studies in Language 28.1.
2. Andersen, G. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
3. Baayen, R. H. and Renouf, A. 1996. “Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper”. Language 72 (1), 69-96.
4. Bäcklund, U. 1973. The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 13). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
5. Berglund, Y. 2000. “'You're gonna, you're not going to': A corpus-based study of colligation and collocation patterns of the (BE) going to construction in Present-day spoken British English”. In PALC'99: Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and P. J. Melia (eds.), 161-192. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
6. Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Biber, D., Johansson, J., Leech, L., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
8. Bolinger, D. 1961. Generality, Gradience and the All-or-none.'s-Gravenhage and Dordrecht: Mouton.
9. Brinton, L. 2002. “Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: on the late use of temporal adverbs”. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology, T. Fanego, M. J. López-Couso and J. Pérez-Guerra (eds.), 67-97. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Campbell, L. and Janda, R. 2001. “Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems”. Language Sciences 23, 93-112.
12. Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Donner, M. 1991. “Adverb form in Middle English”. English Studies 72: 1-11.
14. Gisborne, N. 2000. “The complementation of verbs of appearance by adverbs”. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies; A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg and C. B. McCully (eds.), 53-75. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: a Functional-typological Introduction. Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: a Functional-typological Introduction. Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. 1961. “Categories of the theory of grammar”. Word 17.3, 241-292.
18. Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. and Strevens, P. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
19. Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
20. Hopper, P.J. 1991. “On some principles of grammaticalization”. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.1, E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), 17-35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Hopper, P.J. and Traugott, E.C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
22. Huddleston R. and Pullum, G.K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Janda, R. D. 2001. “Beyond 'pathways' and 'unidirectionality': on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization”. Language Sciences 23, 265-340.
24. Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
25. Johansson, S. 1985. “Grammatical tagging and total accountability”. In Papers on Language and Literature Presented to Alvar Ellegård and Erik Frykman (Gothenburg Studies in English 60), S. Bäckman and G. Kjellmer (eds.), 208-219. Gothenburg.
26. Jones, C. 1988. Grammatical Gender in English: 950 to 1250. London: Croom Helm.
27. Killie, K. 2000a. “On the use of current intuition as a bias in historical linguistics: The case of the look + -ly construction in English”. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies; A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg and C. B. McCully (eds.), 77-101. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Killie, K. 2000b. Stative Adverbs in English: A Study of Adverbial Productivity and Orientation. Dissertation. University of Tromsø.
29. Kroch, A. 2001. “Syntactic change”. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), 699-729. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
31. Laing, M. 1994. “The linguistic analysis of medieval vernacular texts: two projects at Edinburgh”. In Corpora Across Centuries, M. Kytö, M. Rissanen and S. Wright (eds.), 119-141. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
32. Lehmann, C. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: Lincom Europa.
33. Lowth, R. 1762 [1775]). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London. [A facsimile reprint (1979) of the 1775 edition. Delmar, New York: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints.]
34. Macaulay, R. K. S. 1995. “The adverbs of authority”. English World-Wide 16, 37-60.
35. Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. 2nd ed. München: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
36. Markus, M. 2000. “Normalization of the word forms in the Ayenbite of Inwyt”. In Placing Middle English in Context, I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen, P. Pahta and M. Rissanen (eds.), 181-197. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
38. Menn, L. and McWhinney, B. 1984. “The repeated morph constraint”. Language 60, 519-541.
39. Meurman-Solin, A. 2001. “Structured text corpora in the study of language variation and change”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16:1, 5-27.
40. Nevalainen, T. 1997. “The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English”. In Grammaticalization at Work: Studies of Long-term Developments in English, M. Rissanen, M. Kytö and K. Heikkonen (eds.), 145-190. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
41. Nevalainen, T. 2000. “Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the early Modern period”. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies; A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg and C. B. McCully (eds.), 329-371. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
42. Nevalainen, T. and Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.
43. Nevalainen, T. and Rissanen, M. 2002. “Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners”. Language Sciences 24, 359-380.
44. Opdahl, L. 1997. Ly or Zero Suffix? A Study in Variation of Dual-form Adverbs in Present-day English. Bergen: Department of English, University of Bergen.
45. Palander-Collin, M. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding; I Think and Methinks in Middle and Early Modern English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 55). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
46. Paradis, C. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press.
47. Pounder, A. 2001. “Adverb-marking in German and English; system and standardization”. Diachronica 18:2, 301-358.
48. Quirk, R. 1965. “Descriptive statement and serial relationship”. Language 41, 205-217.
49. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
50. Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 1991. The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-century English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 50). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.
51. Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 1996. “Apparent time”. In Sociolinguistics and Language History; Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, T. Nevalainen and H. Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), 93-109. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
52. Rissanen, M. 2000. “Standardization and the language of early statutes”. In The Development of Standard English, 1300-1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, L. Wright (ed.), 117-130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. and Heikkonen, K. (eds.) 1997. Grammaticalization at Work: Studies of Long-term Developments in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
54. Ross, J.R. 1972. “The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort”. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, P. Peranteau, J.N. Levi and G.C. Phares (eds.), 316-328. Chicago: CLS.
55. Sapir, E. 1921 [1978]. Language. London, Toronto, Sydney and New York: Granada Publishing.
56. Sundby, B., Bjørge, A. K. and Haugland, K. E. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700-1800. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
57. Swan, T. 1997. “From manner to subject modification: adverbialization in English”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20, 179-195.
58. Traugott, E. C. 1982. “From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization”. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, W. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
59. Traugott, E.C. 1988. “Is internal semantic-pragmatic reconstruction possible?” In On Language, Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica: A Festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell, C. Duncan-Rose and T. Vennemann (eds.), 128-144. London and New York: Routledge.
60. Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B. (eds.). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
61. Williamson, K. 1992/93. “A computer-aided method for making a Linguistic Atlas of Older Scots”. Scottish Language 11/12, 138-173.