Urban planning and the challenges of the post-socialist transformation

GeoJournal Library

Volumn 92, Issue , 2007, Pages 413-425

  Stanilov, Kiril ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

American Planning Association; European Academy; Planning Process; Urban Planner; Urban Planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103705632     PISSN: 09245499     EISSN: 22150072     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. European Academy of the Urban Environment, 2003, Twelve Candidate Countries Overview Report on Sustainable Urban Management, Sustainable Urban Transport, Sustainable Urban Design and Sustainable Construction, European Academy of the Urban Environment, Berlin.
2. European Academy of the Urban Environment, 1996, Restructuring of Derelict Industrial Areas, European Academy of the Urban Environment, Berlin.
3. European Commission, 1999, ESDP, European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards a Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Union Territory, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
4. Golubchikov, O., 2004, Urban planning in Russia: Towards the market, European Planning Studies 12(2): 230–247.
5. Healey, P. and Williams, R., 1993, European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence, Urban Studies 30: 701–720.
6. Hirt, S., 2005, Planning the postcommunist city: Experiences from Sofia, International Planning Studies 10 (3/4): 219–240.
7. Keivani, R., Parsa, A., and McGreal, S., 2001, Globalisation, institutional structures and real estate markets in Central European cities, Urban Studies 38(13): 2457–2476.
8. Maier, K., 1998, Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies, International Planning Studies 3(3): 351–365.
9. NedovicBudic, Z., 2001, Adjustment of planning practice to the new eastern and central European context, Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1): 38–52.
10. PichlerMilanovic, 2005, The effects of policies and planning regulation on urban sprawl in Slovenia and Ljubljana urban region, Urbs PANDENS.
11. Purchart, V., and Slepicka, A., 1997, Implementierung Umweltbelange in die Gebietsplanung der CR, in: ARL; Fakulta architektury STU Bratislava; SAZP, ed., Implementierung ökolo-gischer Belange in die raumplanerischen Konzeptionen; Hannover/Bratislava, pp. 78–83.
12. Rehnicer, R., 1998, New challenges for urban planning in Central and Eastern Europe, in: Kovács, Z., and Wiessner, R., eds, Procese und Perspektiven der Stadtentvicklung in Ostmitteleuropa, Münchener Geographische Hefte 76, Passau: L.I.S. Verlag, pp. 63–71.
13. Reiner, T. and Strong, A. L., 1995, Formation of land and housing markets in the Czech Republic, Journal of the American Planning Association 61(2): 200–209.
14. Shove, C., and Anderson, R., 1997, Russian city planning, democratic reform, and privatization: emerging trends, Journal of Planning Education and Research 16: 212–221.
15. Sýkora, L., 2006, Urban Development, Policy and Planning in the Czech Republic and Prague, in: Altrock, U., Günter, S., Huning, S., and Peters, D., eds., Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States: From Adjustment to Reinvention, Ashgate.
16. Sýkora, L., 1999, Changes in the internal spatial structure of postcommunist Prague, GeoJournal 49: 79–89.