Informing Design through Parametric Integrated Structural Simulation Iterative structural feedback for design decision support of complex trusses

Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 69-77

  Makris, Michael ^a   Gerber, David ^b   Carlson, Anders ^a   Noble, Doug ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

Design decision support; design optimization; parametric design; structural analysis; structural design

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103000354     PISSN: 26841843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Alfaris, A and Merello, R 2008, ‘The Generative Multi-Perfor-mance Design System’ in ACADIA 08 õ Silicon + Skin õ Biological Processes and Computation, pp. 448-457.
2. Bambardekar, S and Poerschke, U 2009, ‘The Architect as Performer of Energy Simulation in the Early Design Stage’ in Building Simulation 2009: Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 1306-1313.
3. Flager, F and Haymaker, J 2007, ‘A comparison of multidisciplinary design, analysis and optimization processes in the building construction and aerospace industries’ in I Smith (ed), 24th W78 Conference on Bringing ITC knowledge to work, Maribor, Slovenia, pp. 625-630.
4. Gerber, DJ 2009, The parametric affect: Computation, innovation and models for design exploration in contemporary architectural practice, Design and Technology Report Series, Harvard Design School, Cambridge, MA.
5. Gerber, DJ and Lin, S-HE 2012, ‘Designing-in performance through parameterization, automation, and evolutionary algorithms: ‘H.D.S. BEAGLE 1.0’’ in T Fischer et al. (eds), CAADRIA 2012: Beyond Codes and Pixels, Chennai, India, pp. 141-150.
6. Gerber, DJ and Lin, S-HE 2013, ‘Designing in complexity: Simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture’, Simulation.
7. Gerber, DJ, Lin, S-HE, Pan, BP and Solmaz, AS 2012, ‘Design optioneering: Multi-disciplinary design optimization through parameterization, domain integration and automation of a genetic algorithm’ in L Nikolovska and R Attar (eds), SimAUD 2012, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 23-30.
8. Holzer, D, Tengono, Y and Downing, S 2007, ‘Developing a framework for linking design intelligence from multiple professions in the AEC industry’ in A Dong, AV Moere and JS Gero (eds), Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures (CAADFutures) 2007, Springer Netherlands, pp. 303-316.
9. Nicholas, P and Burry, M 2007, ‘Import As: Interpretation and Precision Tools’ in Y Gang, Z Qi and D Wei (eds), CAADRIA 2007, Southeast University, Nanjing, China: Southeast University and Nanjing University, pp. 249-257.
10. Oxman, N 2007, ‘Get real towards performance-driven computational geometry’, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5(4), pp. 663-684.
11. Rolvink, A, van de Straat, R and Coenders, J 2010, ‘Paramet-ric structural design and beyond’, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8(3), pp. 319-336.
12. Sanguinetti, P, Bernal, M, El-Khaldi, M and Erwin, M 2010, ‘Real-time design feedback: Coupling performance-knowledge with design’ in A Khan (ed), SimAUD 2010, Orlando FL, USA, pp. 23-30.
13. Shea, K, Aish, R and Gourtovaia, M 2005, ‘Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools’, Automation in Construction, 14(2), pp. 253-264.
14. Toth, B, Salim, FD, Drogemuller, R, Frazer, JH and Burry, J 2011, ‘Closing the loop of design and analysis: Parametric modelling tools for early decision support’ in CAADRIA 2011, Newcastle, Australia, pp. 525-534.
15. Turrin, M, von Buelow, P and Stouffs, R 2011, ‘Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms’, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(4), pp. 656-675.