Understanding Privacy at the Margins: Introduction

International Journal of Communication

Volumn 12, Issue , 2018, Pages 1157-1165

  MARWICK, ALICE E ^a   BOYD, DANAH ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

marginalization; networked privacy; privacy; socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

EID: 85101063038     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altman, I. (1977). Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific? Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 66–84.
2. Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
3. Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4. boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. boyd, d., & Marwick, A. (2011, September). Social privacy in networked publics: Teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. Presented at A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1925128
6. Bridges, K. M. (2017). The poverty of privacy rights. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
8. Fritz, N., & Gonzales, A. (2018). Not the normal trans story: Negotiating trans narratives while crowdfunding at the margins. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
9. Fullenwieder, L., & Molnar, A. (2018). Settler governance and privacy: Canada’s Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement and the mediation of state-based violence. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
10. Gregg, M. (2013). Work’s intimacy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
11. Hamby, S., Taylor, E., Smith, A., Mitchell, K., & Jones, L. (2018). Technology in rural Appalachia: Cultural strategies of resistance and navigation. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
12. Hjorth, L., Pink, S., & Horst, H. A. (2018). Being at home with privacy: Privacy and mundane intimacy through same-sex locative media practices. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
13. Levy, K., & Barocas, S. (2018). Refractive surveillance: Monitoring customers to manage workers. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
14. Li, X., Chen, W., & Straubhaar, J. D. (2018). Concerns, skills, and activities: Multilayered privacy issues in disadvantaged urban communities. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
15. Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.
16. Marwick, A., Fontaine, C., & boyd, d. (2017). “Nobody sees it, nobody gets mad”: Social media, privacy, and personal responsibility among low-SES youth. Social Media & Society, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2056305117710455
17. Pearce, K. A., Vitak, J., & Barta, K. (2018). Socially mediated visibility: Friendship and dissent in authoritarian Azerbaijan. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
18. Rennie, E., Holcombe-James, I., & Yunkaporta, T. (2018). Privacy versus relatedness: Managing device use in Australia’s remote Aboriginal communities. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
19. Srinivasan, J., Bailur, S., Schoemaker, E., & Seshagiri, S. (2018). The poverty of privacy: Understanding privacy trade-offs from identity infrastructure users in India. International Journal of Communication, 14, this Special Section.
20. Traub, A. (2013). Discredited: How employment credit checks keep qualified workers out of a job. New York, NY: Demos. Retrieved from http://www.demos.org/discredited-how-employment-credit- checks-keep-qualified-workers-out-job
21. Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.