Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 143-176

  Higgins, Julian P T ^a   Li, Tianjing ^b   Deeks, Jonathan J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computing estimates; Continuous data; Count data; Dichotomous data; Difference measures; Effect measures; Ordinal data; Outcome measurements; Ratio measures; Time to event data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85100937406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Abrams KR, Gillies CL, Lambert PC. Meta-analysis of heterogeneously reported trials assessing change from baseline. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:3823-3844.
2. Ades AE, Lu G, Dias S, Mayo-Wilson E, Kounali D. Simultaneous synthesis of treatment effects and mapping to a common scale: an alternative to standardisation. Research Synthesis Methods 2015; 6:96-107.
3. Agresti A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
4. Anzures-Cabrera J, Sarpatwari A, Higgins JPT. Expressing findings from meta-analyses of continuous outcomes in terms of risks. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:2967-2985.
5. Bland M. Estimating mean and standard deviation from the sample size, three quartiles, minimum, and maximum. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research 2015; 4:57-64.
6. Colantuoni E, Scharfstein DO, Wang C, Hashem MD, Leroux A, Needham DM, Girard TD. Statistical methods to compare functional outcomes in randomized controlled trials with high mortality. BMJ 2018; 360:j5748.
7. Collett D. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London (UK): Chapman & Hall; 1994.
8. Deeks J. Are you sure that’s a standard deviation? (part 1). Cochrane News 1997a; 10:11-12.
9. Deeks J. Are you sure that’s a standard deviation? (part 2). Cochrane News 1997b; 11:11-12.
10. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. 2nd edition ed. London (UK): BMJ Publication Group; 2001. pp. 285-312.
11. Deeks JJ. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21:1575-1600.
12. Dubey SD, Lehnhoff RW, Radike AW. A statistical confidence interval for true per cent reduction in caries-incidence studies. Journal of Dental Research 1965; 44:921-923.
13. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. Volume 1: Worldwide Evidence 1985-1990. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1990.
14. Follmann D, Elliott P, Suh I, Cutler J. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992; 45:769-773.
15. Friedrich JO, Adhikari N, Herridge MS, Beyene J. Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death. Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142:510-524.
16. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J. The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008; 8:32.
17. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59:7-10.
18. Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, Welton NJ. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data:reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012; 12:9.
19. Higgins JPT, White IR, Anzures-Cabrera J. Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:6072-6092.
20. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2005; 5:13.
21. Johnston BC, Thorlund K, Schünemann HJ, Xie F, Murad MH, Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010; 8:116.
22. Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 318:1728-1733.
23. MacLennan JM, Shackley F, Heath PT, Deeks JJ, Flamank C, Herbert M, Griffiths H, Hatzmann E, Goilav C, Moxon ER. Safety, immunogenicity, and induction of immunologic memory by a serogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccine in infants: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000; 283:2795-2801.
24. Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham A. Fluoride toothpaste for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003; 1:CD002278.
25. Parmar MKB, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:2815-2834.
26. Sackett DL, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Down with odds ratios! Evidence Based Medicine 1996; 1:164-166.
27. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes BR. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh (UK): Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
28. Simmonds MC, Tierney J, Bowden J, Higgins JPT. Meta-analysis of time-to-event data: a comparison of two-stage methods. Research Synthesis Methods 2011; 2:139-149.
29. Sinclair JC, Bracken MB. Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1994; 47:881-889.
30. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007; 8.
31. Vickers AJ. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001; 1:6.
32. Walter SD, Yao X. Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007; 60:849-852.
33. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014; 14:135.
34. Weir CJ, Butcher I, Assi V, Lewis SC, Murray GD, Langhorne P, Brady MC. Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018; 18:25.
35. Williamson PR, Smith CT, Hutton JL, Marson AG. Aggregate data meta-analysis with time-toevent outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21:3337-3351.