An Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Assessing Driver Workload in the Early Development of In-Vehicle Information Systems

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Angell, Linda S ^a   Young, Richard A ^a   Hankey, Jonathan M ^b   Dingus, Thomas A ^b  

^a GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ROAD VEHICLES; ROADS AND STREETS; VEHICLE PERFORMANCE; WELL TESTING;

CORRESPONDING MEASURES; DRIVER PERFORMANCE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; MULTIVARIATE MODELING; STATIC CONDITIONS; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 85099487313     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-1981     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group (2002). Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 2.0. Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers.
2. Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (2000). Proposed Driver Workload Metrics and Methods Project. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm) .
3. Farber, E., Blanco, M., Foley, J.P., Curry, R., Greenberg, J.A., and Serafin, C.P., (2000). Surrogate measures of visual demand while driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Vol. 3, 274-277. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4. Hankey, J. M., Dingus, T. A., Hanowski, R. J., and Wierwille, W. W., (2000). The development of a design evaluation tool and model of attention demand. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/ departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm).
5. Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E., (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In, Hancock P. A., and Meshkati N., (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
6. Hashimoto, K., and Atsumi, B., (2001). Study of occlusion technique for making the static evaluation method for visual distraction. Japanese Report on Occlusion Workshop. Turin, Italy. November 15, 2001.
7. Martens, M. H., and van Winsum, W., (2000). Measuring distraction: The peripheral detection task. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm) .
8. Olsson, S., and Burns, P. C., Measuring driver visual distraction with a peripheral detection task. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm) .
9. SAE Recommended Practice J2396 (2000). Definitions and Experimental Measures Related to the Specification of Driver Visual Behavior Using Video Based Techniques.
10. SAE (2000). Recommended Practice J2364 (Proposed). Navigation and Route Guidance Function Accessibility while Driving.
11. th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (CD-ROM).
12. VanWinsum, W., Martens, M., and Herland, L., (1999). The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance. TNO Report, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
13. Wierwille, W. W., (2000) Initial development of a computer program for assessment and evaluation of in-vehicle task visual and manual demands. In Gale A. G., (Ed.) vision in Vehicles VIII, North Holland/Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. (In press.) Also, paper presented at the Eight International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Boston, MA, August, 1999.
14. Young, R., (2001) Communication Interface, Vision and the Older Driver. In The Eye and the Auto 2001 Conference, June 2001, http://www.brophy.com/DIO- web/eata/eata2001.htm>