Opportunities in Open Science With AI

Frontiers in Big Data

Volumn 2, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Wang, Kuansan ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

artificial intelligence; big data; microsoft academic graph; open science; research assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098816883     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2624909X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00026     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Candela L. Castelli D. Manghi P. Tani A. (2015). Data journals: a survey. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 66, 1747–1762. 10.1002/asi.23358
2. Dong Y. Ma H. Shen Z. Wang K. (2017). A century of science: globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations, in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Halifax, NS). 10.1145/3097983.3098016
3. Fortunato S. Bergstrom C. T. Börner K. Evans J. A. Helbing D. Milojević S. et al. (2018). Science of science. Science 359:6379. 10.1126/science.aao018529496846
4. Gibbs P. E. (2013). Debating open access. Prespacetime J. 4:7.
5. Gleeson P. Davison A. P. Silver R. A. Ascoli G. A. (2017). A commitment to open source in neuroscience. Neuron 96, 964–965. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.01329216458
6. Harari Y. N. (2011). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York, NY: Harper.
7. Kanakia A. Shen Z. Eide D. Wang K. (2019). A scalable hybrid research paper recommender platform for microsoft academic, in WWW 2019: The Web Conference (San Francisco, CA). 10.1145/3308558.3313700
8. Li Y. Wu C. Yan E. Li K. (2018). Will open access increase journal CiteScores? An empirical investigation over multiple disciplines. PLOS ONE 13:8. 10.1371/journal.pone.020188530161156
9. Mann F. Walter B. V. Hess T. Wigand R. T. (2009). Open access publishing in science. Commun. ACM 52, 135–139. 10.1145/1467247.1467279
10. Microsoft Academic FAQ. How Does Microsoft Academic Rank Publications? Available online at: https://academic.microsoft.com/faq
11. Osborne R. (2015). Open Access Publishing, academic research and scholarly communication. Online Inform. Rev. 39, 637–648. 10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0083
12. Perkel J. (2016). Democratic databases: science on GitHub. Nature 538, 127–128. 10.1038/538127a27708327
13. Pinfield S. Middleton C. (2016). Researchers' adoption of an institutional central fund for open-access article-processing charges: a case study using innovation diffusion theory. SAGE Open 6:1. 10.1177/2158244015625447
14. Piwowar H. (2013). Altmetrics: value all research products. Nature 493:159. 10.1038/493159a23302843
15. Piwowar H. Priem J. Larivière V. Alperin J. P. Matthias L. Norlander B. et al. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6:4375. 10.7717/peerj.437529456894
16. Rougier N. P. Hinsen K. Alexandre F. Arildsen T. Barba L. A. Benureau F. C. Y. et al. (2017). Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative. PeerJ 3, 1–8. 10.7717/peerj-cs.142
17. Shen Z. Ma H. Wang K. (2018). A web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration, in Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Melbourne, VIC), 87–92. 10.18653/v1/P18-4015
18. Sinha A. Shen Z. Song Y. Ma H. Eide D. Hsu B.-J. P. et al. (2015). An overview of Microsoft Academic Service and applications, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence: MAS). 10.1145/2740908.2742839
19. Solomon D. J. Björk B. C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63, 98–107. 10.1002/asi.21660