Context-Sensitive Recognition for Emerging and Rare Entities

3rd Workshop on Noisy User-Generated Text, W-NUT 2017 - Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 172-176

  Rylandwilliams, Jake ^a   Santia, Giovanni C ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CONTEXT FEATURES; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; ENTITY RECOGNITION; NAMED ENTITIES; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; STATE OF THE ART; STATISTICAL ALGORITHM; USER-GENERATED;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 85098166413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Isabelle Augenstein, Leon Derczynski, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2017. Generalisation in named entity recognition: A quantitative analysis. Computer Speech & Language 44:61-83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.012.
2. Johan Bos, Valerio Basile, Kilian Evang, Noortje J. Venhuizen, and Johannes Bjerva. 2017. The Groningen Meaning Bank, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pages 463-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-024-0881-2 18.
3. Leon Derczynski, Diana Maynard, Giuseppe Rizzo, Marieke van Erp, Genevieve Gorrell, Raphal Troncy, Johann Petrak, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2015. Analysis of named entity recognition and linking for tweets. Information Processing & Management 51(2):32 - 49. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.10.006.
4. Zhenfei Ju, Jian Wang, and Fei Zhu. 2011. Named entity recognition from biomedical text using svm. In Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, ( iCBBE) 2011 5th International Conference on. IEEE, pages 1-4.
5. Giridhar Kumaran and James Allan. 2004. Text classification and named entities for new event detection. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, USA, SIGIR '04, pages 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1008992.1009044.
6. John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). pages 282- 289.
7. Gang Luo, Xiaojiang Huang, Chin-Yew Lin, and Zaiqing Nie. 2015. Joint named entity recognition and disambiguation. In Proc. EMNLP. pages 879-880.
8. Andrew McCallum and Wei Li. 2003. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Natural Language Learning at HLT-NAACL 2003 - Volume 4. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, CONLL '03, pages 188- 191. https://doi.org/10.3115/1119176.1119206.
9. Joel Nothman, James R. Curran, and Tara Murphy. 2008. Transforming wikipedia into named entity training data. In In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2008. pages 124-132.
10. Joel Nothman, Nicky Ringland, Will Radford, Tara Murphy, and James R. Curran. 2012. Learning multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence 194:151-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.006.
11. S. T. Piantadosi, H. Tily, and E. Gibson. 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(9):3526. http://colala.bcs.rochester.edu/papers/PNAS-2011- Piantadosi-1012551108.pdf.
12. Alan Ritter, Sam Clark, Mausam, and Oren Etzioni. 2011. Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, EMNLP '11, pages 1524-1534. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145432.2145595.
13. Burr Settles. 2004. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and Its Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, JNLPBA '04, pages 104-107. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1567594.1567618.
14. Claude E. Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell system technical journal 27.
15. Benjamin Strauss, Bethany Toma, Alan Ritter, Marie- Catherine de Marneffe, and Wei Xu. 2016. Results of the wnut16 named entity recognition shared task. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Noisy Usergenerated Text (WNUT). The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee, Osaka, Japan, pages 138-144. http://aclweb.org/anthology/W16-3919.
16. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Natural Language Learning at HLT-NAACL 2003 - Volume 4. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, CONLL '03, pages 142- 147. https://doi.org/10.3115/1119176.1119195.
17. Konstantinos N. Vavliakis, Andreas L. Symeonidis, and Pericles A. Mitkas. 2013. Event identification in web social media through named entity recognition and topic modeling. Data Knowl. Eng. 88:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2013.08.006.
18. Jake Ryland Williams, Eric M. Clark, James P. Bagrow, Christopher M. Danforth, and Peter Sheridan Dodds. 2015a. Identifying missing dictionary entries with frequency-conserving context models. Phys. Rev. E 92:042808. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042808.
19. Jake Ryland Williams, Paul R. Lessard, Suma Desu, Eric M. Clark, James P. Bagrow, Christopher M. Danforth, and Peter Sheridan Dodds. 2015b. Zipf's law holds for phrases, not words. Nature Scientific Reports 5:12209.