Anonymity and Privacy in Biobanking

International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2011, Pages 213-230

  Sándor, Judit ^a   Bárd, Petra ^b  

^a CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b CEU Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Data Protection; Gene Donor; Genetic Sample; Identifiable Person; Personal Data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098058354     PISSN: 18750044     EISSN: 18750036     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1673-5_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2004. Working Document on Genetic Data of 17 March 2004, 12178/03/EN, WP 91.
2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2007a. Working Document on the Processing of Personal Data Relating to Health in Electronic Health Records (EHR) of 15 February 2007, 00323/07/EN WP 131.
3. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2007b. Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data of 20 June 2007, 01248/07/EN WP 136.
4. Chadwick, R. 2001. “Informed Consent in Genetic Research.” In Informed Consent in Medical Research, edited by L. Doyal and J. S. Tobias, 203–10. London: BMJ Books.
5. Claerhout, B., and G. J. E. DeMoor. March 2005. “Privacy Protection for Clinical and Genomic Data: The Use of Privacy-Enhancing Techniques in Medicine.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 74 (2): 257–65.
6. Elger, B. S., and A. L. Caplan. 2006. “Consent and Anonymization in Research Involving Biobanks: Differing Terms and Norms Present Serious Barriers to an International Framework.” European Molecular Biology Organization Reports 7 (7): 661–66.
7. Ellis, I., and G. Mannion. 2001. “Humanity Versus Utility in the Ethics of Research on Human Genetic Material.” Genetics Law Monitor 1 (5): 1.
8. Human Genes Research Act (passed by the Riigikogu). December 13, 2000. (as RT I 2000, 104, 685), entered into force on January 8, 2001 (RT is Riigi Teataja or State Gazette). In the original language: Inimgeeniuuringute seadus, official English translation is available at http://www. legaltext.ee/text/en/X50010.htm. Accessed March 11, 2011.
9. Laurie, G. T. 2002. Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Data Protection Act of 1998. 2002. Legal Guidance. London: Office of the Information Commissioner.
11. Lowrance, W. W. 2002. Learning from Experience: Privacy and the Secondary Use of Data in Health Research. London: Nuffield Trust.
12. Nõmper, A. and K. Kruuv. (2003) “The Estonian Genome Project.” In Society and Genetic Information: Codes and Laws in the Genetic Era, edited by J. Sándor, 213–24. Budapest: CEU Press.
13. Recommendation Rec (2006) 4 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on research on biological materials of human origin.
14. Székely, I. 2009. “Positive Discrimination and Data Protection: A Typology of Solutions and the Use of Modern Information Technologies.” In Privacy Protection and Minority Rights, edited by M. D. Szabó, 27–62. Budapest: Eötvös Károly Policy Institute. Accessed March 11, 2011. http://www.ekint.org/ekint_files/File/kiadvanyok/privacy_minority.pdf.
15. Trouet, C., and D. Sprumont. 2002. “Biobanks: Investing in Regulation.” In Baltic Yearbook of International Law, edited by I. Ziemele, 3–19, vol. 2. Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
16. UNESCO International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, 16 October 2003.
17. Weir, R. F., and R. S. Olick. 2004. The Stored Tissue Issue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Xiao, X., G. Wang, and J. Gehrke. 2009. Interactive Anonymization of Sensitive Data, Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2009, 1051–1054. Accessed March 11, 2011. www.cs.cornell.edu/bigreddata/publications/2009/sigmod2009-p1051-xiao.pdf.